User talk:Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV
|
Suevic
[edit]Hi. Well, that's an interesting proposition! For that subject we have:
i) Onomastic material: the name of the Suevi of Galicia + Germanic names in use in Galicia during the Early and High Middle Ages (most notably those not used in Catalonia or Castille) + place names. For this onomastic material we have, together with other works, the Hispano-gotisches Namenbuch by Josef Piel and Dieter Kremer (where "-gotisches" have a linguistic connotation, as they include names of Suevic persons).
ii) (Loan)words incorporated into Galician and/or Portuguese, and sometimes also nearby Spanish/Leonese dialects. Here we have the rather utile, but non exhaustive, Dicionario Critico Etimologico Castellano e Hispanico, by Joan Coromines, who had a much better access to Galician than Gamillscheg of Meyer-Lübke; still, this is a work about Spanish, so it is not exhaustive in relation with Galician. We have also some contribution by Dieter Kremer, and some local scholars.
As you stated, the main problem here is to differentiate Suevic and Gothic. Most scholars just decided to assume that Sueves were West Germanic speakers and Gothic East Germanic ones, but it is a notable thing that most of the names used among the Sueves of Galicia were clearly East Germanic (cf. Kremer/Piel "Hispano-gotisches Namenbuch"), not different from the ones used by Vandals or Visigoths. In the other hand, and for the Iberian Peninsula, Galicia and northern Portugal in the west, and Catalonia in the east, are where the Germanic personal names were more popular and diverse among the locals, and where we find a larger and more diverse Germanic imprint in the form of loan words and place names.
Then again, the problem with this article would be that a) most evidences are open to debate, as either Suevic or Gothic words; b) I would have to be very careful to not incorporate original research into the article... I let you know if I decide to write this one :-) Cheers.--Froaringus (talk) 14:53, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
November 2013
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lusitanian language may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- one that preserved Indo-Europoean ''p'' (or possibly an already phonetically weakened [{{PIE|ɸ}}] < ''p'', written as P-) as an archaism.<ref name=koch2011/><ref>Anderson, J. M. 1985. «Pre-Roman
- ETOM·INDI·NA.[<br />
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:48, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
The wrong person
[edit]Hey there. Look, when you post an edit request in a protected-template, two thing happens: Either a template editor or administrator asks you a question and you impress them with your answer, in which case they do the change. But if you try to bully, defy, offend or otherwise elude them, they will put a {{not done}} on your message and ignore you; no one else will commit to your request and even if they did, original TE or admin can veto them.
So, do yourself and us a favor and do the first thing. These guys are very easy to impress, especially with examples and source. 188.245.83.59 (talk) 14:59, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- I don’t care. The template’s owner (you?) already decided that they won’t do the change because of their (your?) point of view against artificial languages, and nothing I say will change their point of view on that. Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV (talk) 17:44, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Apparently, you did. A registered user backed you up because of your halfhearted comment and a change is being endorsed. You should believe in the power of friendliness. Well, I guess next time, you just nail it the first time. 46.62.182.15 (talk) 16:55, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- How can friendliness change someone’s dislike of artificial languages? Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV (talk) 05:54, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Apparently, you did. A registered user backed you up because of your halfhearted comment and a change is being endorsed. You should believe in the power of friendliness. Well, I guess next time, you just nail it the first time. 46.62.182.15 (talk) 16:55, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)