User talk:Renamed user Rg18Dt6BOtv6T4802d
Removed Content Protected By Copyright
[edit]Hello Underwaterecho,
I removed some content from the page Juliet Simms. It appears that the text you added to the article is copied from here. You can review the similarity report here. Lastly, you can review my changes here.
Kadane (talk) 22:03, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello Kadane,
I actually just cut and pasted everything you deleted from wikipedia's Automatic Loveletter page (no idea who put it there). I was going to edit most of it.
But I didn't copy it from the page\article you gave me a link to, this one here. If you follow this link and read it, you'll see it makes ZERO mention of the band Automatic Loveletter or Juliet Simms.
I'm going to add accurate content so I guess it's fine you deleted what you did, but next time make sure your reading everything- the page I was editing is about Juliet Simms and her former band 'Automatic Loveletter', and you showed me a link that made no mention of either ...
Which means you had no reason to delete what you did... :( ?
User:Underwaterecho (User talk:Underwaterecho)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
[edit] Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Automatic Loveletter into Juliet Simms. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:00, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Thank you Diannaa <3 I'm new at all of this and what your saying makes total sense, I'm sorry I didn't think of\consider that before. Next time I will definitely do it the way you described. Anything else I was going to add is from magazine articles, and I will have the necessary Footnotes\links for Anything I put in here, obvi ;) Thank you for the info and tip and PLZ everyone feel free to explain\tell me stuff. I look stuff up in the Wikipedia how-to's and guidelines but yeah, still learning. Thank you again!