User talk:Underøathfan

May 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. An article you recently created, It's Dangerous Business Walking out Your Front Door, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. —dima /talk/ 20:31, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding article creation of Fourth My Chemical Romance Album

Hi, I redirected the article Fourth My Chemical Romance Album back to the main My Chemical Romance article. I did this because there is no solid information about the album. There are no sources suggesting the title "Stay" or "The World Is Ugly" are the titles of those respective songs and the suspected release date also did not have a source. There is not enough information about this album. Please see WP:CRYSTAL which states "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball". There must be enough information and reliable sources to warrant an article and at the moment that is not the case. Orfen ^T • _C 02:33, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding article creation of 30 Seconds to Mars 3rd Album

I would just like to note that WP:CRYSTAL is the same reason I redirected the page 30 Seconds to Mars 3rd Album back to the band page too. There was one sentence that said the album was in production which is already covered on the main page. Not enough information yet to warrant an article. Orfen ^T • _C 02:43, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tonight Is Glory

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Tonight Is Glory, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.purevolume.com/tonightisglory. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:18, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Tonight Is Glory

A tag has been placed on Tonight Is Glory requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 19:51, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Tonight Is Glory

A tag has been placed on Tonight Is Glory requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mazeau (talk) 03:54, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Edge of the Earth

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Edge of the Earth. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edge of the Earth. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]