User talk:Unclfester

Welcome to Wikipedia. I'm sorry for removing your external links to heart-beats.org, but I have my doubts whether this link is appropriate according to the Wikipedia external links policy. Support groups and/or forums are not typically notable enough to qualify for inclusion in links sections, especially when the information offered on their sites is not authoratitive, the number of participants is small etc.

You are most welcome to contribute original content to Wikipedia, which would be much welcomed. JFW | T@lk 13:28, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Steve, it was not my intention to bite a newcomer, nor do I have anything about either heart-beats.org or its very good goals. I'm trying to get the point accross that Wikipedia is not the forum to increase exposure or even help people. It is an encyclopedia. There are hundreds of small and large, grassroots or corporate-sponsored "help" organisations. It is not Wikipedia's task to make these organisations known to the general public, even if a small group of people may eventually benefit from it. A side point: Wikipedia tries to have a global scope. Heart-beats.org is American and aimed at Americans.

Please do not be disappointed by this, and avoid labelling my actions as "appalling". You are encouraged to discuss this issue further on Wikipedia_talk:External links. You will find that many Wikipedia users will probably agree with my assessment.

I saw your message on User:Unclfester. Having looked after patients with your condition I know very well how awful it is. Best of luck. JFW | T@lk 20:15, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the external links policy ("links to normally avoid", #11) for the policy I have based my actions on. JFW | T@lk 20:17, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I suggest you follow the procedure as outlined in WP:EL - make an entry on the talk pages of the articles where you'd like to insert an external link, and see what other contributors think. I do not have the final word on this - I'm simply interpreting established policy. It may turn out that the link will be considered acceptable on organ transplant and not on myocardial infarction, for example. JFW | T@lk 22:09, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]