User talk:Uncle Al

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! Courtkittie 21:33, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Angels edits

Hello,
First, I must commend you for your work on the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim page. But oddly, that page is now the longest baseball team page, and they have not even been around for 1/2 as long as most teams. Would you mind condensing the bulk of the history into a couple of sections and then maybe create a new article, History of the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim? You can then add the note on this page above the abbreviated article to see

Main article: History of the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim

Just a suggestion, I noticed the article size was longer than recommended that's all.
Let me know what you think, have a good one!--CrazyTalk 20:31, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

user vs. user talk

I'm guessing you meant to put this here instead of on CrazyTalk's user page, right? --fvw * 23:53, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Walt Disney

Hi! Thanks for keeping an eye on that page. There's continuing childish vandalism going on there at the moment, but the server is so agonishingly slow in accepting edits (at least here from Finland), that I can't keep up with it. It also appears our edits were crossed, so I overwrote yours by mistake... Please continue your vigilance, thanks! --Janke | Talk 15:50, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the refs on Ford Thunderbird

Those make the section read a lot better and less POV. Thanks! —Matthew Brown (T:C) 00:23, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Major Leagues

For consistency, when editing the National League you need a sockpuppet named "Uncle Nl". d:) Wahkeenah 02:54, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An actual "AL" cap. That's excellent. The old Los Angeles Angels PCL cap would work for that too... if you read from bottom up. Looking at the neatly organized AL page, I see there is room for improvement in the NL page. That is, it would be nice to omit some of the wordiness (much of it my own) that attempts to explain all the pre-1900 franchise shifting. It needs a simple section called "Charter Members" like the AL page has, with some footnotes indicating what happened to them and when. Or maybe two sections: 1876 Charter Members and 1900 "Classic Eight" Members. For example, the Atlanta Braves are arguably the direct descendants of the Cincinnati Red Stockings of 1869-1870, and definitely the sole surviving charter member of the National Association of Professional Baseball Players, which is kind of an awesome fact to us historians. And there are also a few teams that are the last survivors of the American Association. Then there is Wrigley Field, Chicago, the last relic of the Federal League, but that's another story. d:) Wahkeenah 05:32, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One question about the PCL. I gather you're in the Bay Area. But I wonder if anyone can pin down the exact dates (or range of dates) when L.A.'s Wrigley Field was razed. The Internet seems to parrot the same vague "1966" reference. There must almost certainly be something in the L.A. papers about it, around that time. Like you have nothing better to do. d:) Wahkeenah 05:32, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added the sections in the lower portion of the NL page that I had mentioned. I have not actually altered the earlier text yet. Please review (unless someone else gets to it first). Wahkeenah 06:38, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oakland Athletics: All-Time Team

Don't get me wrong because I'm a big A's fan, but I don't see how this article is wikipedia material. The article is the all time A's team according to thebaseballpage.com, what about other people's all time A's? Also this article, while verifiable, does not seem to offer fact but somebody's subjective analysis, or opinion. I'm nominating this article for AfD and I guess you can make your case there. Please don't take this the wrong way. Dspserpico 07:57, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Steele.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Steele.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Bill-king.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Bill-king.PNG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Gamaliel 23:32, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Bill-king.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bill-king.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:41, 7 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 03:41, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Grizzlies new.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Grizzlies new.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. fuzzy510 04:22, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ANA 487.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ANA 487.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:28, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:King simmons fosse.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:King simmons fosse.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Saam.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Saam.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cof.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Cof.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:16, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:1866.PNG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:1866.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 00:42, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:General Partners 1968.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:General Partners 1968.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:32, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]