User talk:Umichaan

License tagging for Image:Nodame cantabile 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nodame cantabile 2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Nodame cantabile 11.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nodame cantabile 11.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:07, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nodame end.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Nodame end.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Janarius 13:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC) The image is replaced by the title logo in Nodame Cantabile, I guess it's more encyclopedic that way.[reply]