User talk:Umbertocalderon

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Carprodyl Palatable Tablets - Agrovet Market Animal Health.png, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.agrovetmarket.com/ViewCatalogUI.aspx?.language=2&.product=78. As a copyright violation, Image:Carprodyl Palatable Tablets - Agrovet Market Animal Health.png appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Carprodyl Palatable Tablets - Agrovet Market Animal Health.png has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Carprodyl Palatable Tablets - Agrovet Market Animal Health.png]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Carprodyl Palatable Tablets - Agrovet Market Animal Health.png]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Carprodyl Palatable Tablets - Agrovet Market Animal Health.png]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 18:40, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent spam for agrovetmarket

A single link to the page specifically for a product is sufficient...we are an encyclopedia, so "number of times a certain commerical cite is referenced" doesn't affect anything anywhere. OTOH, it does make you look like a spammer for that company...please fix your recent additions to avoid spamming our encyclopedia. DMacks (talk) 18:48, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Doraquest LA oral gel.png, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.agrovetmarket.com/ShowProductsUI.aspx?.language=4&.kind=4&.product=108. As a copyright violation, Image:Doraquest LA oral gel.png appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Doraquest LA oral gel.png has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Doraquest LA oral gel.png]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Doraquest LA oral gel.png]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Doraquest LA oral gel.png]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 19:35, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Doramec L.A. Injectable Solution.png, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.agrovetmarket.com/ShowProductsUI.aspx?.language=2. As a copyright violation, Image:Doramec L.A. Injectable Solution.png appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Doramec L.A. Injectable Solution.png has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Doramec L.A. Injectable Solution.png]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Doramec L.A. Injectable Solution.png]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Doramec L.A. Injectable Solution.png]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 19:35, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict-of-interest regarding your edits

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 20:30, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Agrovet Market Animal Health

I have nominated Agrovet Market Animal Health, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agrovet Market Animal Health. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Oo7565 (talk) 17:00, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Agrovet Market Animal Health for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agrovet Market Animal Health is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agrovet Market Animal Health (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:56, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Agrovetmarket.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Agrovetmarket.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 05:43, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]