User talk:Ultratone85

Welcome

Hello, looks like you've been here a while now, but no one took the time to welcome you. If I may, welcome to Wikipedia! You seem to know your way around pretty well, and have made many good contributions. If you should happen to need help with anything, please feel free to ask me. heqs ·:. 18:49, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prowords

Further to your question at Talk:Procedure word, the term "five by five" originates from early radio users, who described signals on a scale of one to five, referring first to strength and then to clarity. So "two by four" is a weak (faint) but relatively clear signal. Editus Reloaded 20:17, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, other way round. The above example would be a strong but garbled signal. Editus Reloaded 20:18, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:2 uparmored D7s.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:2 uparmored D7s.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:53, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Operation COOKIE MONSTER

HEMTT

Hi Ultratone85 - you uploaded this file sometime ago? Could you tell me what that thing on the back is supposed to be? An improvised mobile shooting stand? Cheers, Ingolfson (talk) 05:31, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

3MEF

This user is a member of the
3rd Marine Expeditionary Force.

Noticed that you created this one. I would love to add this userbox to my page. Would you mind if I, or could you please, edit it to say "This user is/was a member..."? --Wakamusha (talk) 23:25, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Noticed that you haven't been online in a while and nobody seems to be using this. I'm just going to go ahead and change it. My apologies if you have any objections to this. --Wakamusha (talk) 19:37, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pawtucket Pat, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 00:56, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you identified my edit as vandalism. Pawtucket Pat isn't discussed anywhere in the Family Guy article. The episode that this character appears in is the episode Wasted Talent. To me it only makes sense that this redirect goes to the Wasted Talent article. Ultratone85 (talk) 01:48, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're absolutely right. Your edit makes perfect sense, and was clearly not vandalism. The mistake is completely mine, and I apologize. I've undone my revert of your edit. Sorry for the mixup. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 12:19, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ammo

I know what you mean. When I write for the gun magazines or firearm related websites and need to photograph a new round, I typically do it with similar cartridges to illustrate the size. For example, if it was a 454 Casull, I'd show it next to a 45 Colt, 45 ACP, maybe a 223 round to show the size off. Sometimes you can get away with that here, but ideally it might be best to show them with some type of ruler. We don't really have standards for pictures as we're all going off public domain and take what we can get. Maybe if you could, take several of each one. Say you got a 243; one photo would be the round next to a 308 (parent cartridge) and a 223 (smaller bullet diameter). Then a second pic might be the round next to a steel ruler. The point would be how you feel you could best tell the story with a pic. For example a 30-06 and a 50 BMG are the same dimensionally and each individual round with no ruler or other objects for comparison fails to show the size of the 50 BMG. What calibers do you have? I'll help you out however I can. Semper Fi!--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 04:01, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, I like how the second one shows the measurements and the comparison to the other cartridges. Some cake-eater who's never seen a gun outside of a movie can see the length and those who know a little more get the relation in size to 45 ACP and the Magnum.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 00:38, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great job! I should dig through my collection and attempt the same. Let me know when you add them to articles and I'll make sure everything else is in place (infobox, refs, etc). Hopefully we can get alot of pages cleaned up that way.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 23:24, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, must have been some rare ones because nothing hit my watchlist aside from S&W Model 17. I'll go through them and fill in what's needed. Thanks. Maybe if I come across some rare ones in my shop, I'll send them to you if you want to do pics, to try to keep them consistent.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 23:39, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not sure if I’m doing this correctly...

If you are the owner of the Arisaka ammo photo, could you tell me some history of that particular 30-06 round pictured on the far right. The exposed metal tip and double cannelure make it different than any other 30-06 I’ve seen. Is it milsurp? Armor piercing? If it’s AP, why isn’t it black tip? Lead tip? If lead, why is it pointy?

I’ve searched all over. I assume the headstamp reads, “REM UMC 30-06 SPRG.”

JB101 (talk) 05:47, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Josh[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ultratone85. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ultratone85. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ultratone85. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To Do: Write an article about Metalurgist and referee Harry Kessler. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1953/09/19/incorporeal

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]