User talk:Ultrablastic123

Welcome!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! mhking (talk) 03:30, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ----Divebomb is not British 15:26, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

This account has been temporarily blocked because it is suspected to be a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 03:50, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ultrablastic123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Now i'm new to this website and I had no idea that posting a certain amount of comments on the articles for deletion section in a certain amount of time could get you accused of sock puppiting. Now I tell you in the name of all thats good that I never did sockpuppting and never will, many other non admin users post on these articles and are never accused, so why am I accused? is it that I dont detail it enough? if so I will try to detail it more and if I am a sock puppit then who is my other user? Also that I am completley against sockpuppiting or anything that is not good conduct in wikipedia. Good day to you.

Decline reason:

There is no limit to the number of comments that can be made to an AfD discussion. There is a limit to the number of accounts you can use to do so, which is one. You were blocked because it appears you are actually User:Wiki brah who has been banned from this site. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 00:07, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ultrablastic123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Honestly I have no idea who wiki brah is, this must be an effect of collateral damage, all I simply wanted to do was edit and help wikipedia and I will no longer post on the AFD page if necessary, but I promise that I never did sockpuppiting and never will.Ultrablastic123 (talk) 18:59, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Having examined your editing history I do not believe that you were new to editing Wikipedia when this account was created. There are also suggestive similarities between some edits from this account and from Wiki brah. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:14, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ultrablastic123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I really am not a sockpuppet of WikiBrah, I've waited a while now and in my opinion it's just coincidence, I am here to simply edit wikipedia, I don't want this looming over my future on wikipedia. Use a check user if you have to, but I really am not a sockpuppet.--Ultrablastic123 (talk) 21:35, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A checkuser was conducted at the time of your block, and it is now too late to conduct one. This block was largely based on behavioral evidence anyway, which is very compelling (as previously noted). Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 22:09, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ultrablastic123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unless Wiki Brah is using the same network as me, I dont see how this is possible. I ask that a checkuser check me again or I will take this to the arbitration commite.--Ultrablastic123 (talk) 22:30, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As pointed out by Hersfold, it's too late to run another CheckUser investigation, as the data are more than three months old. I too find the behavioral evidence compelling. Favonian (talk) 22:40, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.