User talk:Ultimatehooly

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Colgate (toothpaste), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. This material is irrelevant to the article at hand; consensus has long been that YTP is non-notable, and adding this material constitutes vandalism. If you desire to establish the notability YTP, you are recommended to review WP:N, as there are many clear guidelines as to why this material has, so far, been non-notable. Yngvarr (t) (c) 22:34, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

With this revert, you are now engaged in an edit war. The material is vandalism, and will be dealt with as such. Yngvarr (t) (c) 00:17, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Colgate (toothpaste)‎. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. And since you are removing the valid fact tags, I will consider this a level two warning. Yngvarr (t) (c) 00:19, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed those by accident and they are now back. You do not need sources for everything, as long as it is true.Ultimatehooly (talk) 00:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You need sources for everything, please review WP:V. Yngvarr (t) (c) 00:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That rule should not be. It is impossible that my imformation is "irrelevent to the article at hand" as it DIRECTLY relates to the subject of the article and is thus in one of the most relevent places it can be on Wikipedia. My "removal of fact tags" is due to the fact that I restored my content by editing that version of the page and thus reverting the imtermidiate edits in which those tags were added. I am not saying that those tags shouldn't be there and as long as you keep my content there there will be no need for me to revert its removal and potentially remove content from imtermidiate edits.Ultimatehooly (talk) 05:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since the material which you have added has been repeatedly removed by multiple editors, it is very possible that your additions are irrelevant. Yngvarr (t) (c) 09:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of ANI discussion

Hello, Ultimatehooly. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Yngvarr (t) (c) 00:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]