User talk:Ulissipus

A page you started (Cravos de Abril) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Cravos de Abril, Ulissipus!

Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This is reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.

July 2013

Hello, I'm Jamesx12345. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Drifts, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jamesx12345 (talk) 23:41, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Drift. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

I explained when I reverted you the first time that entries in disambiguation pages should only have one link to another page, and that the link to upcoming films is irrelevant because that page doesn't even mention Drifts. Also "upcoming" is not a standard English word in the formal register expected of an encyclopedia article, and, given that User:Tertulius has assured us that shooting is complete for this film, "unreleased" is more accurate as it implies that the film is complete and ready for release, whereas "upcoming" could mean that the film is only in the planning stage. Please reply at Talk:Drift so that we can keep the discussion in one place where others can also get involved. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:36, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Melgueiro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Environment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to David Melgueiro may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

//www.causamerita.com/descobrimentos4fase_i.htm 4th Fase of the discovery period] (1510 – 1580)] – at [http://www.causamerita.com/ Causa Merita] NOTE: Melgueiro figures as the last explorer of

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:03, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of docufiction films

As a courtesy, I wanted to let you know that I have posted on the Talk page for the above article the question why Nanook of the North should be excluded from the list. Please post any response there. Thanks. Nandt1 (talk) 15:20, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the first paragraph of Nanook of the North. Fictional elements in the film are docudrama and not docufiction.

Ulissipus (talk) 03:30, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Left Bloc, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LCI. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Cephalopod. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Mr Fink (talk) 01:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ulissipus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Squid. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.--Mr Fink (talk) 20:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ulissipus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]