User talk:Ulikleafar

——————————————— TALK PAGE ———————————————

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article U-lik.com, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:U-lik.com. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.--Fuhghettaboutit 03:43, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will not argue over U-lik.com deletion if it doesn't fit the general policy. I can wait for other wikipedians to get interested in U.[lik] and I will delete the article myself based on your return. I have also a more described version in my sandbox.

Nevertheless, Collaborative Systems are still on their early days. It's formed by small communities and explain why traffic is not heavy (if we except ready to go music system like pandora or last.fm). This article is mainly interesting for people trying to break CF to get to a decent result (better than the 34% evaluated trough Monte Carlo technics). Furthemore, U-lik is commited to University researches and works with 2 schools in France, the point of me creating an article was to give the opportunity to let Universitarian discover what we do and how we made the research go further. We work on a technology that bridges Collaborative Filetring and Content Based (like pandora) approaches, the community in France is really small and we'd loved to create interaction and discussion with US University searchers.

Hi again Ulikleafa. I got your message. The reason I don't think the article belongs here is that encyclopedias are not the place to announce new things which rely on themselves as the primary source of information. Instead, an encyclopedia is a tertiary source which synthesizes already existing information from secondary sources about things that are notable (note that notable is not a reflection on worth; things may be great but unknown). This is all wrapped up in various policies and guidelines such as verifiability, a prohibition on original research providing reliable sources and standards for notability which, in this case, would probably come from a specific subsection guideline covering notability of websites at WP:WEB.

Please note that there is no policy or guideline stopping you from removing the proposed deletion template I added to the page—in fact, that is the expected way for you to protest the proposed deletion. However, if you do so, the article can still be taken to articles for deletion where a more formal debate occurs to decide whether to keep the article. Please take none of this personally. Thousands of articles are deleted every day. Having a first article proposed for deletion can sour some people on the site as a whole, but your response to the proposed deletion seems quite level-headed, and I hope that even if the article is deleted, you'll stick around and continue contributing. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit 16:04, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

----

I do not fill the right to modify other article in the page since it is direct competition (even from proclaimed Non commercial). If you think that the data gathered below are relevant I'll be glad to see them on the Collaborative filtering discussion page.

Analysis of the Collaborative Filtering Wiki: / Commercial systems

AlexLit.com Alexa rank = 2,361,819
GenieLab Alexa rank = 408,549
Loomia Alexa rank = 174,063
Net Perceptions Alexa rank = No Data
Radiolibre.ca Alexa rank = 581,828
Reciprodate Alexa rank = 159,760
StoryCode Alexa rank = 597,615 (Content Based as Pandora)
Sourcelight Alexa rank = 914,098
Touchstone Alexa rank = 427,734

/ Non Commercial systems

AmphetaRate Alexa rank = 3,984,993
Audiobaba Alexa rank = 760,909 Possibly commercial
Clinko Alexa rank = 639,033
Everyone's a Critic Alexa rank = 1,832,609
FilmAffinity Alexa rank = 18,305 But Commercial.
GiveALink.org Alexa rank = 435,866
Gnod Alexa rank = 657,106
Gnomoradio Alexa rank = 3,611,833
Grepr Alexa rank = Not applicable since Open Soft
Indy Alexa rank =
iRATE radio Alexa rank =
KindaKarma Alexa rank = 2,780,513 And Commercial
like-i-like.org Alexa rank = NO DATA Based on Drupal
Moonranker Alexa rank = 5,941,226
MovieCritic Alexa rank = - Now Closed from Macromedia so clearly was commercial
MovieLens Alexa rank = 2,187
Musicmobs Alexa rank = 193,467 And Commercial
MyStrands Alexa rank = 153,177 Commercial.
Popularism Alexa rank = NO DATA Not working
Rate Your Music Alexa rank = 11,012 Commercial
StumbleUpon Alexa rank =
Upto11 Alexa rank =
WikiLens Alexa rank =

Yoichi Nagano

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Yoichi Nagano, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.foiltokyo.com/gallery/artists/yoichinaganoeg.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:43, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Yoichi Nagano

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Yoichi Nagano, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.foiltokyo.com/gallery/artists/yoichinaganoeg.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Yoichi Nagano and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Yoichi Nagano with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Yoichi Nagano.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Yoichi Nagano/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Yoichi Nagano saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:14, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I just wanted to add as a personal addition to the automatically generated "form letter" above that we need verification of permission to utilize this material on Wikipedia. A reference is not sufficient. If you have any questions about the verification process or would otherwise like to discuss this matter, please let me know at my talk page. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:14, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Ulikleafar! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Angelin Preljocaj - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jacques Monory - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:24, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

PPR (company) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Yves Saint Laurent, Wolseley, Puma, AGF, Somewhere and King Size

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited François-Henri Pinault, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HEC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC) ---> Corrected[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited PPR (company), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brioni (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. When you recently edited Sergio Rossi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anne Hathaway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kering Foundation

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Kering Foundation, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Fondation PPR. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 15:24, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Kering Foundation Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Kering Foundation Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:14, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Boucheron.png missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Logo Boucheron.png

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 08:22, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Kering logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Kering logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 08:37, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kering Foundation Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kering Foundation Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:07, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sergio Rossi.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sergio Rossi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ulikleafar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]