User talk:Ulicnihodac

License tagging for File:Grbok kakanj09.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Grbok kakanj09.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Grbok kakanj09.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Grbok kakanj09.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:46, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Lepic-ermin2008.jpg

Hello. Concerning your upload of the image File:Lepic-ermin2008.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted images obtained from other sources, without the permission of the author(s). This image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.ok-kakanj.com/odbojkasi. As a copyright violation, File:Lepic-ermin2008.jpg falls under the speedy deletion criteria and has been deleted.

If you believe that the image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under a free license then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave me a message explaining the details and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the <pick a free licence> or released into the public domain leave me a message at my talk page with a link to where I can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:File:Lepic-ermin2008.jpg]].
Or alternately drop me a note about this file if I have misunderstood something.
- Peripitus (Talk) 10:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

alert

Please do not create new articles without sources. Adding the unsourced tag does not help that much: if you create the article on an athlete, you must be doing it from some source. Please add them immediately when you do the article. I advise you to do this very quickly, before articles gets deleted, which they will. Please see our |guide to writing Wikipedia articles . DGG (talk) 18:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Geneve-.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Geneve-.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. [midnight comet] [talk] 13:58, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Geneve4.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Geneve4.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. [midnight comet] [talk] 13:59, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:KakanjinGeneve3.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:KakanjinGeneve3.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. [midnight comet] [talk] 13:59, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Ekipa1.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Ekipa1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. [midnight comet] [talk] 14:01, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Ulicnihodac! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 12 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 318 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Salih Fazlic - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Haris Zolota - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Emir Bajramovic - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Nedzmin Kozlo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Amir Curan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Rijad Delic - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Almir Aganovic - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ermin Lepic - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Amir Brakmic - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Adnan Herco - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Damir Bjelopoljak 12. Aldin Spahovic

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emir Bajramovic

The article Emir Bajramovic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I have "emir+bajramovic"+-wikipedia+-facebook tried and failed to find evidence that the subject of this article meets WP:BIO article inclusion requirements.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gonzonoir (talk) 08:40, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Almir Aganovic for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Almir Aganovic, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Almir Aganovic until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kevin (talk) 00:47, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sanjin Bezdrob for deletion

The article Sanjin Bezdrob is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjin Bezdrob until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 17:55, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amir Brakmic for deletion

The article Amir Brakmic is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Brakmic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 17:57, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amir Curan for deletion

The article Amir Curan is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Curan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 18:00, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nedzmin Kozlo for deletion

The article Nedzmin Kozlo is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nedzmin Kozlo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:07, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Sanjo.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Sanjo.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:01, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Bjelopoljak-damir.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bjelopoljak-damir.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 19:40, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Brakmic-amir.jpg

The file File:Brakmic-amir.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]