User talk:Ulfrikr

Dana Davis

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Dana Davis, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Dana Davis headshot.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dana Davis headshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:27, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Ulfrikr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

208.100.40.41 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

{{blocked proxy}}:

Blocking administrator: KrakatoaKatie (talk • blocks)

Accept reason: This is a closed proxy. -- DQ (t) (e) 12:00, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I got the blocked message when I tried to edit pages from work. I work at Libbey Glass in Shreveport LA, though I suspect our 'net traffic is routed through corporate headquarters in Toledo Ohio. I figure our ISP is within a blocked range or something, due to abuse from other ISP customers. I'd really like to be able to edit Wikipedia from work, as my home 'net access is now limited to dialup, and I'm working on researching the condition I've just been diagnosed with and trying to update the relevant articles. Thanks for looking at this for me, Katie. Wolfrick (talk) 17:45, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to view WP:IPBE, you have a clean block log, although only 100 odd edits, so that might require a checkuser to approve. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:37, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]