User talk:UlfKjell

Notability of NOW (European music group)

A tag has been placed on NOW (European music group) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eeekster (talk) 12:55, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello UlfKjell! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 233 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Ulf Kjell Gür - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:19, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arild Kristo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arild Kristo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arild Kristo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Daiyusha (talk) 11:18, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Arild Kristo was an offbeat but major artist in photography, graphic design and filmmaking. His works hangs on walls in MOMA, have been national and internationally funded, been shown/exhibited all over the world. His production is not so big, but always held a unique quality. --UlfKjell (talk) 16:30, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Manité for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manité is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manité until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Daiyusha (talk) 11:44, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Manité was during the 1960's a European force in photography. They had integrity, were unique, well renowned, reflected different styles, and even commercially successful. Very few photographic collectives beats that. Films, books and exhibitions has covered their works. --UlfKjell (talk) 16:26, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Robert A. Robinson

Hello UlfKjell,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Robert A. Robinson for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 15:32, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SamHolt, Before adding Robert A. Robinson I checked the Wikipedia register for US and European photographers. I suppose that doing unique projects should count. Also not work that you are hired to do. Or the glamour factor. Bob Robinson is unique, has taking a lot of own initiatives, have formed a couple of art groups and exhibition areas, bur has a very low glamour factor. He belongs in the U.S. and European files over photography as an art form. --UlfKjell (talk) 16:27, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.46.177.66 (talk) 15:52, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kowalski (rockband) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kowalski (rockband), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whispering^(t) 15:05, 14 December 2018 (UTC) Thank you for the remarks. I'll do my best to find the Kowalski material from the 80's. --UlfKjell (talk) 06:47, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Robert A. Robinson moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Robert A. Robinson, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 11:25, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Young (photographer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dan Young (photographer), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 11:26, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of New Processean Order

Hello UlfKjell,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged New Processean Order for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 11:29, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Elena Alice Fossi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Elena Alice Fossi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:02, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've moved this article to draft space because it does not currently meet the criteria for inclusion. Please work on it in draft space before re-submitting. Deb (talk) 12:04, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Teatro Satanico

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Teatro Satanico requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:02, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robert A. Robinson

Hello, UlfKjell. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Robert A. Robinson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 00:43, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kowalski (rockband)

Hello, UlfKjell. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kowalski".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Elena Alice Fossi

Hello, UlfKjell. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Elena Alice Fossi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:30, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Britain's Psychic Challenge

The article Britain's Psychic Challenge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 15:49, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Wikipedia/Bolyen - Britain's Psychic Challenge is the original Tv-series. Since you have published the American Psychic Challenge - version, I find it odd that you reject the original. Peace, --UlfKjell (talk) 18:32, 4 January 2020 (UTC) {{subst:proposed deletion notify|1=Mary Ann MacLean|concern=Subject's has no notability outside their association/founding to the [[Process Church of the Final Judgment] and Best Friends Animal Society.}} dashiellx (talk) 14:59, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]