User talk:UkrainianSavior1

October 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Moscow; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. David Biddulph (talk) 14:25, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in mind that there was a missing citation on the matter, and the writing of that particular portion of the article did not point to it being established by then. Something to think about in terms of accuracy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UkrainianSavior1 (talk • contribs) 23:06, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Old East Slavic; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. –Austronesier (talk) 08:37, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On another note, I would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Calling other editor's contributions "propaganda and vandalism" and titulating them as "Russian agents" does not help to create an environment for constructive editing. This also includes reporting other editors for vandalism, when they disagree with your point of view in an ongoing content dispute. –Austronesier (talk) 09:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tell that to those that are actually reverting my edits and calling it "Vandalism" and "POV pushing". If you notice the edits before they arrived, most users agreed with the changes while also making a few adjustments of their own, with them reverting mine and everyone else's hard work "Just because it was like this for years", which certainly isn't true, and can thus be surmised that they are trying to push an agenda, given the fact that the users are Russian and that many such users have made completely POV-based edits before on subjects pertaining to Ukraine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UkrainianSavior1 (talk • contribs) 23:06, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Veverve (talk) 22:55, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Demographics of Ukraine, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Austronesier (talk) 11:28, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ―Eduardogobi (talk) 20:33, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There was absolutely nothing about my changes that constituted vandalism - the information I added in was up to date, with the detractors denying the facts displayed before them, that are already cited in the article.

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Due to your disruptive behavior, I requested a ban for you: here.--Veverve (talk) 23:52, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]