User talk:Ukiws

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Ukiws, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Bentworth. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jaguar (talk) 12:35, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Bentworth. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jaguar (talk) 14:02, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bentworth

Perhaps if you could find verifiable (i.e. not verbal) references for your points, and then discuss them on the talk page it might help. If there is a reference for the other view and none for yours, you don't stand a chance. Watch out for the 3RR rule too - you must not revert something more than three times in 24 hours or you will get blocked. Peridon (talk) 22:52, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You keep asking how this can be corrected. I'm telling you, but you are ignoring me. You may well have excellent local knowledge - you also MUST have references to back you up. Your word for it DOESN'T COUNT. Sorry, that's the rule. See WP:V about verifiability, and WP:RS for what are reliable sources. If you go on ignoring advice and the rules, you will get blocked from editing. And then your knowledge will not get used. Up to you. Peridon (talk) 23:21, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Hi Ukiws, it's obvious you know a great deal about Hampshire and Bentworth in particular, but it would help enormously if you added supporting references. We can't use other Wikipedia articles as references (see Wikipedia:Reliable sources) but if you can find something to support what you know (as I know myself from my own area of expertise in geology this can be difficult) it reduces the likelihood of reversions and excessive discussions. Cheers, Mikenorton (talk) 23:08, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bentworth and Bentworth Hall

Hi Ukiws,

snip

I have been trying very hard to look at Bentworth Hall for a year now but the closest I can get to seeing it was by standing on the edge of Tinker's Lane.

IWS (Ian William Strachan): Just email ian@ukiws.demon.co.uk or ring 01 420 564 195 and come round. I have a lot of historical material both on paper and as JPEGs and Word Documents. We have just hosted a Canadian Professor from McGill who is writing a book about George Cecil Ives (see the Wiki entry) and Victorian sexuality. He lived with his mother Emma Ives at the present Bentworth Hall which was built about 1832 when the owner apparently did not like the original Bentworth Hall on the main village road to Medstead and built a new "mansion" with walls of mortar and squared flints.

IWS: There are therefore two places in the village that have been called Bentworth Hall. The original is just S of the Star pub and is now called Hall Place (at one time, Hall Farm), goes back to the 1200s and has mediaeval wall paintings (I have colour photos that the present occupants, Antonia and Charles Peal, let me take). After 1832 the name "Bentworth Hall" refers to the present "mansion" that is off the main road and marked on the OS 1:50,000 map as Be tworth Hall.

If you are the owner of Bentworth Hall

IWS: We have been in the West Wing since 1983. After Major Berens died in 1982 the accommodation an Bentworth Hall was split into five, the main house into three and the stable block into two. That is the arrangement today.

14 December 2011 (20:40 UTC)

That's a nice picture of Bentworth Hall. Last year I found a real one dating from the 1910s but I was told that this should not be put into the Bentworth article because for some reasons a picture of a picture cannot be allowed on Wikipedia articles. I must thank you for expanding the article Bentworth on my start I made in 2008 and then returned to in 2010. I'm afraid that for my own good I can't use Wikipedia anymore (or as much as I used to) so I won't be expanding Bentworth anymore. I mainly did it off research. Thank you very much for expanding the article. By the way, should the Bentworth Royal Wedding celebration image be in the 'prehistory' section? (I moved it into the 'recent history' section). Regards Jaguar (talk) 22:09, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

From UKIWS (Ian Strachan). Thanks for the above. I have just taken a photo of the "Sun" pub and also have pictures of the annual Bentworth village fete, both worthy of inclusion.

I have a request.

Please restore the "edit" facility to the first section of the Bentworth entry. I would like to propose some changes but at the moment cannot do so. For instance, there should be a cross-reference to the Bentworth Parish Council web site http://bentworth.org.uk

BTW, I hope that you like the additions about the village pubs, the information mainly from Georgia Smith's book on the village (I knew her, she lived in Holt End at a house called "Jockeys" and died abut 15 years ago).

With your permission, I will continue tidying up the Bentworth web site.

Thanks for your work on the article. The "edit" tags are all still there - the first section in the History section might have moved to the right slightly due to the picture being moved but all the edit buttons are still there. As for the Bentworth Parish website, http://www.bentworth.info/home/home.html is in the infobox of the article and if you would like to replace that with the http://bentworth.org.uk link, then you can do so in the infobox or alternately the link can be placed in the 'External links' section. I could do that if you like!

The information on the village pubs are amazing! When I was in the Star last year I found a booklet detailing on Bentworth's history and it was by Georgia Smith. Also if you are looking for any other free images of Bentworth that may be used in the article they can be found here on Wikipedia Commons including a few pictures of Bentworth I took last year. Thanks for tidying the article. Regards, Jaguar (talk) 12:59, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To edit first section

You say that you couldn't find an edit link for the first section of an article. You can edit the first section (or any other part of the article) by clicking the edit tab at the top of the article, but if you want to see an edit link specifically for the first section you can enable this in the "Gadgets" section of the preferences for your account. - David Biddulph (talk) 20:11, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Lasham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medstead (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Bentworth CP 2012a.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bentworth CP 2012a.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:19, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bentworth CP 2012a.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bentworth CP 2012a.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:01, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Bentworth & Lasham Stn 1928.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Bentworth & Lasham Stn 1928.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. $The Haz talk$ 19:42, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed --Guerillero | My Talk 04:10, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links

In your changes to Bentworth, you seem to be making a habit of including inline external links. If you read WP:ELNO you will see that inline external links should not be used; you may well want to change them to references. - David Biddulph (talk) 20:17, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Ben & Las stn 1905 & 2012.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ben & Las stn 1905 & 2012.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

From UKIWS. The colour picture is mine and the other is over 100 years old and therefore out of copyright.6 Feb 2012 22:30 UTC

Bentworth for GA?

Are you trying to nominate Bentworth for a Good Article like I did back in 2010? I got to warn you, if my revision did not pass, then this current revision of the Bentworth article won't pass. If you're interested in bringing it up to GA, then you can ask me as I've reviewed some Good Articles in the past and also you can familiarise yourself with guide for nominating good articles. If you want, I can copy edit Bentworth again so it would have a better chance of passing. Please respond if you want to know more! Jaguar (talk) 18:30, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

From Ukiws: Dear Jaguar, I note your comments but there have been major changes in layout, text and photos since 2010, from which I noted the adverse comments in the 2010 GA assessment and have tried to satisfy them. Let's see what others think. Ukiws (talk) 09:30 UTC, 17 February 2012

I've made major improvements, its currently under review. I need you though to tell me your sources for historic parish size and villages in the administration section, can't find a thing on it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:26, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

From Ukiws: Dear Dr B, your comment noted. I'll see if more references can be added from my file on local history. BTW I assume that your wiki name is a pseudonym, but I did know a Mike Blofield when I was in the UK Air Force, he was a fellow pilot and an Air-to-Air refuelling instructor at RAF Marham in the 1960s. Ukiws (talk) 09:15 UTC, 17 February 2012

Hi Ukiws. My wiki name is based on Ernst Stavro Blofeld, the villain from the James Bond films. You may be pleased to know Bentworth passed GA after the overhaul I gave it. Thankyou for improving it. The administration section does need more sources though. I would love for you to take some modern photographs of Bentworth Hall exterior and interior if possible as I plan on creating an article on it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:49, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Format for article lead page

Please stop. Your edits are completely against GA guidleines, you are well aware of this by now. I want to retain GA status. Clutter and pictures in the lead is not acceptable. If you want to improve content, leave the lead alone.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 15:59, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop wasting your time and everybody elses. Unless you adhere to guidelines you will continue to be reverted. Why not put your energy into some military history articles or other villages in East Hampshire?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 16:41, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

From Ukiws: I have looked carefully at the Guidelines and MOS and see no reference to banning other pictures from a lead. They are present in other Wiki articles. I am trying to make the first page attractive to view so that readers may wish to go further. However, to preserve peace I will pull out the second picture, but replace the boring one of the Church with the Village party near The Star. The church is well covered later. Ukiws (talk) 20:47, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Style

Hi Ukiws, you have a great deal of knowledge of Bentworth, and so do I, and Dr. Blofeld. I must tell you the reason why you are being reverted when you edit Bentworth is that your use of style of writing does not meet Wikipedia's guidelines. Putting pictures in the lead is not how Wikipedia works; there are no other articles like that. If you want, read WP:MOS (manual of style) for more information. The reason why we are all reverting your edits is because we want to keep Bentworth's Good Article status, but if there are pictures in the lead somebody is going to remove the Good Article status... if you have a good knowledge of the area, why don't you build up the Lasham article? Or Lasham Airfield? Shalden? Bentworth Hall? Kind regards, ☠ Jaguar ☠ 16:52, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

From Ukiws: I have looked carefully at the Guidelines and MOS and see no reference to banning other pictures from a lead. They are present in other Wiki articles. I am trying to make the first page attractive to view so that readers may wish to go further. However, to preserve peace I will pull out the second picture, but replace the boring one of the Church with the Village party near The Star. The church is well covered later. Ukiws (talk) 20:07, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Bentworth & Lasham Stn 1928.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Bentworth & Lasham Stn 1928.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:33, 13 January 2014 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:33, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sutton Valence may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Marshal, 2nd Earl of Pembroke|William Marshal]], the manor passing to him on her death in 1215 (the date of Magna Carta. At that time, Marshal was perhaps the most important noble in the land

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:09, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sutton Valence, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ashford and Sir Edmund Filmer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bentworth Stream

Hello Ukiws, thank you for your recent edits to Bentworth. Last year I read The Villager and I saw your entry on page 7 about Bentworth's former river. I became very interested in this and created an article about it (Bentworth Stream). Unfortunately other than a few sources I have little information about it, however I do know for a fact that it once existed! If you can help out here it would be very appreciated. Thank you! Regards ☠ Jaguar ☠ 20:43, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ukiws, you must be careful of edit warring. There is a general rule on Wikipedia of the WP:3RR (three revert rule). I will restore all of your facts to the previous version of the lead. I will explain why me and Dr. Blofeld keep reverting you; the reason is because Bentworth is a Good Article and we have to keep it that way. Your revision of the lead is considered cluttered and will not meet the GA criteria which is very important! If you have any questions or suggestions please talk to me about it, I really don't want to take the risk of either one of us getting blocked due to edit warring. Regards ☠ Jaguar ☠ 20:28, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring at Bentworth

Your recent editing history at Bentworth shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --David Biddulph (talk) 16:18, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is becoming extremely annoying having you tamper with the lede and generally degrade the article everytime you edit it. The lede is perfectly well structured as it is. Please stop otherwise we'll have you topic banned from the article.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:37, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edits at List of birds of Florida

Hello Ukiws, I've followed some of your edits at List of birds of Florida and wanted to let you know about some of the standard writing style rules on Wikipedia.

There is no shortage of space in Wikipedia, so there's seldom a need to abbreviate, so you can write "southeast" instead of "SE" or "Florida" instead of "FL" which will be unfamiliar to non Americans.
In an article about birds of Florida, there's no need to say that each photo is taken in Florida.
Bird and other species' common names are not generally capitalized.

Just a few things that might help you. Keep up the good work. SchreiberBike talk 23:47, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Bentworth - Hooker the Carrier.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Bentworth - Hooker the Carrier.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 03:22, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Bentworth Manor1890.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Bentworth Manor1890.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 03:23, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ukiws. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ian Strachan (Pilot) (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ian Strachan (Pilot) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 21:37, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ukiws, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 21:37, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ukiws. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ian Strachan (Pilot) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ian Strachan (Pilot), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ian Strachan (Pilot) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ian Strachan (Pilot), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ian Strachan (Pilot)

Hello, Ukiws. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ian Strachan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Home Lander (talk) 03:56, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bentworth Hall about 1905.jpg needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Bentworth Hall about 1905.jpg appears to be missing information as to one (or more) of the following :

The author or creators of the work, (including information as to the author's lifespan).
Where and how this particular version was obtained.
When the work was created,

If you did provide such information, it is currently confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Ukiws}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

Please also add authorship and sourcing to other files you created or uplopaded. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:13, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ukiws. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re Entry on Spanish Armada

English Armada

Why have you erased that the English Armada (1589) was also a failed expedition?

Are you a revisionist? Jacob34T (talk) 20:24, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UKIWS reply: The full details on the English Counter Armada are in the article headed "English Armada", so there was no intention to hide its "failure". By all means put the extra words back, if you like Ukiws (talk) 12:35, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Laptop no longer allowing Wikipedia updates

A couple of days ago on one of my Laptops, on trying to edit the Wikipedia article on Southwick Park (Eisenhower's HQ on D-day in 1944), I had a screen which says:

" Editing from 89.238.128.0/18 has been blocked (disabled) by ‪GeneralizationsAreB " and then " The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider."

My other laptop and two desktops are working OK with Wikipedia, so I do not understand the above problem.

Maybe I used the affected laptop to edit a Wikipedia entry when I was away from home, perhaps the host site was dodgy?

In future perhaps I should carry out any Wikipedia editing from home where my internet connection will (hopefully) be OK.

Meanwhile, please be kind enough to un-block my affected laptop

Kind regards

Ian Strachan (Ukiws)

Blocked from editing on Laptop

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ukiws (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 89.238.128.0/18. Further information: A couple of days ago on one of my Laptops, on trying to edit the Wikipedia article on Southwick Park (Eisenhower's HQ on D-day in 1944) my laptop seems to have been blocked from further editing. My other laptop and two desktops are working OK with Wikipedia, so I do not understand the above problem. Maybe I used the affected laptop to edit a Wikipedia entry when I was away from home, perhaps the host site was dodgy? In future perhaps I should carry out any Wikipedia editing from home where my internet connection will (hopefully) be OK. Meanwhile, please be kind enough to un-block my affected laptop. Many thanks. Ukiws (talk) 14:41, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please disable your proxy/vpn and try again in 24 hours. That should clear things up! Yamla (talk) 15:02, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

April 2020

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Vickers Valiant. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 21:09, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sheffield City Hall

Thanks for contributing to the article Sheffield City Hall. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Sorry but you can only used reliable published sources, not personal experience. Dormskirk (talk) 22:04, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Wnitsbury Manor.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Wnitsbury Manor.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 07:45, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sheffield City Hall

Thanks for contributing to the article Sheffield City Hall. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 21:26, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Bentworth fete x 2.jpg

The file File:Bentworth fete x 2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Small, low-res, no obvious use. Superseded by files at c:Category:Tug of war and c:Category:Tug of war.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:35, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sheffield City Hall, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 15:31, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strachan ian william moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Strachan ian william. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strachan Ian William moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Strachan Ian William. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:06, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hi Ukiws! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Edward VII that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 15:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Edward VII. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. It is disruptive to continue to mark major edits as minor after being asked to stop. Also, please note Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Edit warring. DrKay (talk) 15:46, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Strachan ian william

Hello, Ukiws. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Strachan ian william, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Strachan ian william

Hello, Ukiws. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Strachan ian william".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Strachan Ian William

Hello, Ukiws. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Strachan Ian William".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:04, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Andrew Humphrey, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 16:20, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]