User talk:Uitvlugtandci

Welcome!

Hello, Uitvlugtandci, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Irfaan Ali does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kleuske (talk) 17:52, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How do I close this account permanently

? Uitvlugtandci (talk) 16:06, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot have your account deleted. If you want to leave Wikipedia, the typical approach is to simply stop editing. There is courtesy vanishing, but that wouldn't do much since you only have a few edits, and the only page in your userspace is this talk page, which probably wouldn't be deleted. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:57, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Irfaan Ali, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Note: going straight to level 4im as user vandalized with IP before creating account, and ignored attempt at communication. ;; Maddy ♥︎(they/she)♥︎ :: talk 18:12, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Irfaan Ali. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:47, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Irfaan Ali) for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:58, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Uitvlugtandci. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Irfaan Ali, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Uitvlugtandci. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Uitvlugtandci|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:10, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]