User talk:UhZeletics

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UhZeletics (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Seriously, what did I do? I don't know that user and I don't have anything to do with that user. This is quite ridiculous. I don't see a good reason for being blocked. I didn't vandalize or violate any rules or policies on Wikipedia. UhZeletics (talk) 17:15, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry was established through technical evidence and you have provided no reason to believe otherwise. Yamla (talk) 17:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UhZeletics (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Technical, huh? Well, since you have falsely accused me, I might have to report you. To me, that seems like abuse of power. I have nothing to do with Thurmondt and I am serious. If this continues, I will delete everything on this talk page and never associate with Wikipedia again. Now, this just seems like an unreliable source for studying. Very disappointing. Please consider my request. Many users use this IP Address because I attend a school with many students. Please understand that as you review my request. Thanks! UhZeletics (talk) 22:36, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 05:41, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

UhZeletics (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

47.49.166.206 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Not provided

Blocking administrator: not provided.

Decline reason: Autoblock is working as intended. Huon (talk) 00:04, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:16, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]