User talk:Ugochu

This is Ugochu's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lawrence Onyekele Obibuaku (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Lacks any inline citations referencing reliable sources - see Wikipedia's guide to referencing for beginners.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lawrence Onyekele Obibuaku and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lawrence Onyekele Obibuaku, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:44, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ugochu! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:44, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Lawrence Onyekele Obibuaku has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lawrence Onyekele Obibuaku. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 09:38, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lawrence Onyekele Obibuaku (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi.

I’m sorry, but the sourcing here isn’t helping the subject meet our General Notability Guidelines nor WP:NACADEMIC. The sources are all primary sources affiliated with the subject.

We need *significant* in-depth coverage (that is independent of the subject - meaning no promotional pieces, government websites, event websites, social media, press releases, paid coverage) in notable major media outlets or by notable publishers about Lawrence Onyekele Obibuakut. Examples: magazine and newspaper reviews and features about Lawrence Onyekele Obibuaku specifically; books or peer-reviewed white papers written ABOUT Lawrence Onyekele Obibuaku; television and radio features ABOUT Lawrence Onyekele Obibuakut.

This can even include books, papers, media coverage about Lawrence Onyekele Obibuaku's work.

So also see WP:RS for additional guidance on what reliable secondary sources.

If those are available, please improve this submission. If not, then it might not be the right time (WP:TOOSOON) for Lawrence Onyekele Obibuaku to have a Wikipedia article.

I hope you will consider improving existing Wikipedia content about other subjects of interest!

If you have any questions please ask them at WP:TEAHOUSE.

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lawrence Onyekele Obibuaku and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 23:42, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lawrence Onyekele Obibuaku (December 3)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Jamiebuba (talk) 10:36, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blog spamming

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:Lawrence Onyekele Obibuaku. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Haoreima (talk) 19:37, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thank you for your comments. However, I am at a loss. There is one link within the body of the article which links back to Wikipedia.

There are links to the references which are academic sources, universities, news outlets and NGOs.

The latest source used Is :

https://stanfordanamcityproject.wordpress.com/2012/04/04/reading-reflection-what-makes-a-good-ngo/

Which relates to a review of the subject’s work. Please let me know how the above or other link to references may relate to:

· advertising or promotion, personal websites or affiliated to the subject.

I am happy to to discuss the link. Ugochu (talk) 09:37, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for your interest! The link you are talking about is from WordPress. Sources from WordPress, Blogspot, Medium, Quora, Facebook, etc. are usually not considered as reliable sources. For further information, please see at WP:RELIABLE and WP:NOBLOG. Tell me if you need any help! Regards! :-) Haoreima (talk) 12:08, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thank you. I have reviewed the guide. My understanding from your initial post was that the article contained inappropriate external links. Regarding the reliability of the source, please note Stanford Anam City Project was initiated by Dr. Aloy & Gesare Chife Foundation, Stanford University Engineers for a Sustainable World, Ball State University Department of Landscape Architecture.(See links: http://www.newtowninstitute.org/newtowndata/newtown.php?newtownId=1939

https://eswstanford.weebly.com/about.html)

The article was written by a project engineer on the project. Please let me know if the sole fact that the reviews was written via World Press make the article/review unreliable. Ugochu (talk) 15:57, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not talking about everything that is included in the article. I am talking only about the link from WordPress that you have added. Others seem to be ok. Haoreima (talk) 17:23, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lawrence Onyekele Obibuaku

Hello, Ugochu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lawrence Onyekele Obibuaku, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lawrence Onyekele Obibuaku

Hello, Ugochu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lawrence Onyekele Obibuaku".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:00, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]