User talk:Uglinessman

FNORD

Hi! This is Icarus!, being non-Wiki (I'm not logged in...), saying thanx for the work on the Discordianism page! Keep it up!24.176.20.60 17:36, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD on Badger Badger Badger

I formatted your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badger Badger Badger to fit the standard layout for Article for Deletion pages. I think you probably meant to vote keep, but I didn't want to presume and change it for you, so I marked it only as a comment. Please do update that if you want to register your vote formally. Cheers! — Saxifrage ✎ 18:42, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this, it was my first time getting involved in one of these discussions, and since my comment landed there first I was unaware of the format. I voted "strong keep", as you probably guessed I would. - Ugliness Man 23:27, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! I figured it was something like that. There's all kinds of small learning curves like this scattered across Wikipedia—congrats on this milestone. ;-) — Saxifrage ✎ 23:44, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Children

In "Are You There God?...", Chef refered to Stan as children

When I get a chance I'll find my disc of that season so I can confirm, thank you. And please remember to sign your comments in the future, it's not really a big deal to hit four tildes. - Ugliness Man 10:29, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

/Ombudsman welcome
/kooks

Canadian Idiot deletion

If you have any problems concerning my reasons for deleting the article, you could take it up with me at my talk page. If you want to open general discussion, you could start a new topic on the "Straight Outta Lynwood" article. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 00:19, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From This Moment On

Thanks a lot for the info and cleanup. I'm leaving "Boulevard..." as the 12th track for now – if any editors want to change this later, they'll come across your comment and can decide for themselves what to do. Fvasconcellos 14:15, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Peer review/Sparks (band)/archive2

I've put this up for its 2nd peer review - maybe you would like to add some comments and suggestions. regards--KaptKos 09:31, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invitation, but to be honest I only started watching the article because of the Weird Al connection. I understand why the citation tag was added to the mention of "Virus Alert", but I don't really have enough interest in the article to start digging around for a source. My hope was that someone who's actually a fan of the band would go ahead and do so, but it doesn't seem to have happened yet. I listened to some of the Sparks' music on Pandora, and quite frankly I was underwhelmed. I wish you well in your efforts, but I don't really care enough about it to take part. For what it's worth, there's no longer any question as to whether or not the song is a Sparks tribute. The Mael brothers are thanked in the liner notes, the animated video features musicians that resemble them, and the musical resemblence is fairly obvious, all that's left is for Al to confirm the tribute in an interview, which is less likely to happen than it was on previous ablums, since he now includes his style parody targets in his "Special Thanks" (so the question isn't likely to be asked in the first place). - Ugliness Man 12:35, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Devo 2.0 and Alan Myers

Checking my Devo 2.0 album liner notes, Alan Myers did *not* play on the album. It lists Freese for Whip It and The Winner, and another drummer, Neil Taylor for the rest of the tracks.

Thanks

Heh, thanks for the notes. Added Stax to List of MTG terms. Tt's a Type 1 deck that uses, dunno if it's still viable, a variety of artifacts like Smokestack to lock down gameplay while using all that jazzy Type 1 artifact abuse to pump out powerful and expensive cards way too early. And I'd been meaning to archive my talk page. Staxringold _talk^contribs 19:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD on Doctor Steel

Uglinessman, changes have been made to Doctor Steel and I would like to direct your attention to the voting being done on the afd talk page.

Image tagging for Image:Kris_kross.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kris_kross.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:48, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's the ugliness man

I'm just trying to bug you (i thought that my dreadfulness might be a thing to annoy you with) Poobslag 16:04, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dare to be Stupid

Hi - thanks for your good faith input to Dare to be Stupid. It's actually not close to Devo's cover of Satisfaction. Al's Dare to be Stupid has some of the same chord progressions and rhythmic devices as "Big Mess" and many of the same synth riffs. I believe I can find a citation for it - I'll add something to the page... Yes, here's one, [1] - this person claims it has "Big Mess" and a little of "Deep Sleep" as well. Here's one that says it's "Freedom of Choice" and "Big Mess" [2]. This one also says "Big Mess" and "Deep Sleep" [3]. Anyway, thanks again, but I changed it back. Give "Big Mess" a listen if you want, then listen to "Dare to be Stupid." Here's a "Stupid" clip from Amazon [4] and here's Devo's "Satisfaction": [5]. Gekritzl 22:28, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Woops, sorry, I just noticed your comment said the video is closer to "Satisfaction". My mistake. And you're right, it is. (Feel free to add that info on the page if you want.) It's got a little of the "Whip It" video too (here's Whip It at Youtube: [6]). But, my contribution to the article did say bearing closest resemblance musically to Devo's "Big Mess" so it's still valid. Gekritzl 22:55, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Both the video and the song contain elements from many Devo songs (I see elements in the video from "Satisfaction", "Whip It", "Beautiful World", "Freedom of Choice" and "Come Back Jonee", and that's just from memory, I'm sure I could spot at least 3 more while watching it). As has been discussed at length in many Al-related articles, a style parody of a particular artist is by definition not a parody of a specific song. Mentioning similarities to specific songs is sometimes legitimate, but most of the time is OR. All of those links you provided to support your argument are the opinions of individuals and are not encyclopedic. The article in question is an article about the album in general, getting into the specifics of which Devo elements are present in the song would be superfluous at best, and OR at worst. If there is ever a Weird Al wiki, then every style parody can have a list of individual songs which seem to be influential, but this is not a Weird Al wiki, this is the general Wikipedia, and there is already way too much trivia on the Al-related articles as it is. - Ugliness Man 01:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nathan Wiley Bottom Dollar.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nathan Wiley Bottom Dollar.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Doctor Steel Page AfD

Hi. You weighed in on the Doctor Steel AfD debate back in February 2007. Thought you might like to know that there is a new one up for review, in case you wish to comment again. I have contacted as many as I could who weighed in on the last one, both for and against, in an effort to be fair. --Jonnybgoode44 (talk) 06:38, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Freurlogo.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Freurlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 19:28, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help from an expert

Hi there. I've recently been working on improving the 'Gloomy Sunday' article, and noticed that you showed an interest in it at a previous date. Well excuse my boldness (and absolute noobiness) but as you would notice if you go onto the article, I've been having some trouble with the picture (could never quite figure out the damn uploading process). Since I have absolutly no where left to turn, I was wondering if I could badger some of the past contributers (or anyone else who reads this in pity) to maybe assit in fixing the image problems? I know this is a bit of a stretch, but hey, we're all here to contribute ey? If you can help, that would be great, but otherwise, thanks regardless :)Trollyboy (talk) 12:57, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nathan Wiley High Low.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nathan Wiley High Low.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]