User talk:Udupa0000

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Joshi punekar per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Joshi punekar. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

ST47 (talk) 02:15, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Udupa0000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello @ST47,My name is Karthik Udupa,I am not disclosing my complete information here as this is public medium.I request you to kindly revisit the block as I saw the report which mentions name like krishna and madwachari but I am clearly stating that this is my first Wikipedia account and only one account.I might have edited without creating account way back(May be occasionally) but this is my genuine account running in public WiFi.Do consider my behaviour in Wikipedia too as it was not at all abusive to anyone instead it was productive(Refer Gaud saraswat brahmin talk page).I can understand that you are doing your work but I request you to reconsider my accounts block.If required I can give all the details of mine.Udupa0000 (talk) 05:32, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Unambiguous. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 05:41, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Udupa0000 (talk) 05:32, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Udupa0000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I need not to expect more for this kind of unilateral behaviour.No problem keep your block as it hardly affects me.Admins should have experience here it seems you people have arrogance.Without reading message you declined my request this is how monopoly works.Good bye Udupa0000 (talk) 05:59, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. If you want to go out and start your own encyclopedia project, you are free to. 331dot (talk) 09:14, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Exit Note

@ST47before moving out let me clear you one point.This was my first Wikipedia account and your suspect was wrong.Keep this as negative badge. Good bye. Udupa0000 (talk) 06:03, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]