User talk:Uditichopra

Prarthana rao (talk) 06:33, 11 August 2011 (UTC) Hahaha! I know! Learning how to operate this is a tough process.[reply]

hi uditi.. Tejaswee.shrestha (talk)tejaswee.shrestha —Preceding undated comment added 17:28, 16 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Please go to Robinson Crusoe Economy and rate my page. You'll find this right at the bottom of the page. Thank you. :) - Abhilasha369 (talk) 05:51, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A cheeseburger for you!

I wish we could have this for lunch everyday!!! Abhilasha369 (talk) 05:52, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Hey Uditi! This is for your contributions so far, it seems you are working on multiple articles. Keep it up!

Cheers,

Ram (talk 18:47, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Minor barnstar
	Minor edits are often overlooked, but are essential contributions to Wikipedia. The Minor Barnstar is awarded for making minor edits of the utmost quality. You go girl!!! :) Abhilasha369 (talk) 16:18, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your contributions to your article :) Good job! Roshnisaigal (talk) 17:34, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Economics of Lord Mahavira for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Economics of Lord Mahavira is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economics of Lord Mahavira until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 11:21, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"There is a book called economics of Mahavira by Acharya Mahaprajna on which the whole essay seems based. No other discussion by independent scholarly sources on the issue". The article is considered notable only if there is wide coverage by third party references. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:54, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like a good academic paper/essay topic, but notability is questionable. The whole article seems to rely directly/indirectly on Mahaprajna's book on the subject. Please add the reasons why the article should not be deleted on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economics of Lord Mahavira, rather than my talk as it will a community decision to delete, not my decision alone. Thanks. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:33, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]