User talk:UWDI ced

Freedom Socialist Party

Could you please see my follow-up comment at Talk:Freedom Socialist Party#UW resource? I can see that your intentions are excellent, but what you are doing is perilously close to wiki-spam, and if you want this to be generally positively viewed, then you need to link these things in a way that inherently documents their relevance. - Jmabel | Talk 21:52, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History of Seattle

Usually I'm really happy with what you are adding, but this is a bit much for one page. Is there some one link on your site that would, in turn, lead to this multiplicity of resources? - Jmabel | Talk 23:41, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is getting long. This page (collections grouped by subject) may be preferable, plus there is a link to a keyword search across the collections. UWDI ced 15:31, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I cleaned up the entries a bit; took James Gregory's project from underneath the Libraries heading (it's not part of the Libraries). I also made MOHAI and WSHS headings rather than subheadings under HistoryLink, since HistoryLink is a resource not an organization. UWDI ced 20:00, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. - Jmabel | Talk 21:05, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia policies

While I am sympathetic to your cause, please be aware that you are likely falling afoul of a few Wikipedia policies. Most importantly, "role accounts" are forbidden and you will be blocked if an administrator ever notices (or is told about) your account. You should also look into our conflict of interest guidelines as using Wikipedia exclusively as a vehicle to promote your own collections seems to fall afoul of our COI guidelines. --ElKevbo 18:24, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing this out. I'm very interested in staying on Wikipedia's "good side" as I think it's a great tool.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]