User talk:UTYVB7

Howdy

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, UTYVB7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! MuffledThud (talk) 17:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Mike Handel. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. MuffledThud (talk) 17:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Handel

Hello, and thanks for your contributions. Could you please join the discussion at Talk:Mike Handel? Let's sort out citations for material per WP:BLP. Thanks, MuffledThud (talk) 17:14, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Mike Handel

Hello! Your submission of Mike Handel at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ≈ Chamal ^talk ¤ 05:34, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:18, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mike Handel

On March 2, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mike Handel, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Ucucha 00:07, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, UTYVB7. You have new messages at Talk:Mike Handel.
Message added 03:51, 2 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NW (Talk) 03:51, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Mike Handel

I have nominated Mike Handel, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Handel. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. NW (Talk) 23:07, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I've blocked this account from editing, as it appears to have been used for abusive sockpuppetry. Involved accounts include:

Pumpkins Taste Good (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Golfing is Poetry (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
77 Express (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Handel Publishing (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Average Iniquity (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Hawkeyed Falcon (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
UTYVB7 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
ClerkBlind101 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

If you have a good explanation for why you might appear to be socking, you can appeal this action by following the instructions at guide to appealing blocks. – Luna Santin (talk) 23:25, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UTYVB7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Poor form. I'm not here to vandalize, but I'd like to hand out a barnstar or two.

Decline reason:

This does not really address the reason for your block. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:33, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UTYVB7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well it does actually. I was disrupting Wikipedia to make a point, but I have now made that point, and I would like to be unblocked so that I can help repair the bits of damage that remain and give some credit where credit is due. I pose no threat to the wiki

Decline reason:

See comment below. –MuZemike 01:47, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why should we unblock you if you wholeheartedly admit to disrupting Wikipedia to make a point? –MuZemike 01:38, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh nevermind.