User talk:USAthegreatest

Welcome!

Hello, USAthegreatest, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Quinton Feldberg (talk) 13:36, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese language

Hello, I'm Canterbury Tail. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.Canterbury Tail talk 16:50, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Do not make unexplained blanking of valid article sections again, as you did in here. Thank you. Alex Shih ^Talk 17:20, 25 August 2017 (UTC) Hello.I don't agree with youUSAthegreatest (talk) 17:49, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. Canterbury Tail talk 17:59, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

まあね。俺のほうが日本語にもっと詳しいと思ってるけどな。承知しました。。Ok,I got it.USAthegreatest (talk) 18:03, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

まあ、私は日本語も話します。Don't revert other edits because you don't like them. Anyone can edit Wikipedia regardless of their nationality. If you revert another editor's edits you must provide a reason. You cannot remove references without providing replacement references to support what you're trying to say. Canterbury Tail talk 18:26, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions

I suggest that you read through some of the information linked at the top of your talk page if you wish to contribute to Wikipedia. It will walk you through what you need to know to edit and provide access to further information such as references etc. Doing a little reading now will make your Wikipedia experience go that much smoother.

I must ask however, have you edited Wikipedia before and if so under what username have you previously edited. Canterbury Tail talk 19:22, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was setting up a link.Thanks.USAthegreatest (talk) 19:24, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The link you provide is not a valid reference. Revolvy is simply a copy of Wikipedia, all it does is post a Wikipedia article. If what you mention on that page is true then you should be able to provide a valid academic reference per WP:Verifiability and WP:Reference. Again the Revolvy.com link is just a copy of Wikipedia and therefore invalid. Canterbury Tail talk 19:52, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Canterbury Tail talk 19:50, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? Canterbury Tail

I told you that i didn't do edit war.I said that user satoshi kondo did distortion of history and I just corrected historical distortion.I didn't do any edit war and vandalism.As i said I'm 57 years old man and you missunderstand me.If you check what satoshi kondo edited, you will know that.Backje and goguryo and yemek culure and Gaya are well known that they are Korean history.Why do you keep acting like this?I set up the link.I really don't understand why you are so complaning about this.You know My english is not good.So i feel like i'm being threatened by you. ThanksUSAthegreatest (talk) 19:56, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts

I've blocked your undisclosed accounts USAgreatest (talk · contribs) and Yamakoudou (talk · contribs). You're being disruptive enough with this account, you don't need to be mucking about with additional ones. See WP:SOCK for the relevant policies regarding multiple accounts and please stick to a single account moving forward.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:55, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that i have to have only one account.Actually,I live in a dormitory in Auckland university.So other people also use this computer.yamakoudou is my professor's friend account.Thanks.USAthegreatest (talk) 21:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of multiple accounts, overall disruption and concerns regarding your ability to edit here.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:28, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]