User talk:UNK

Welcome

Hello, UNK, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 15:16, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why, thank you Kukini!! --UNK 15:41, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tenebrous

Editing a closed RfC and an RfA which you are not part of strikes me as being a really bad idea. I don't know if it's against policy or not, but something tells me that they don't look favorably on that around here. Tenebrous 07:29, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for you opinion, when I think it is a good idea. I am currently studying your edit history and too busy to deal with you personally. --UNK 07:33, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What on earth do you mean by that? Why are you studying my edit history, and how precisely do you mean to 'deal with' me? Tenebrous 07:40, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently studying your edit history. --UNK 07:42, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am too busy to deal with you personally. --UNK 07:42, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How remarkably uninformative. Why are you studying my edit history? What do you mean by 'deal with'? Explain, or I shall assume that you intend to wikistalk and otherwise harass me, as you appear to be doing to Wikipediatrix. Tenebrous 07:52, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are notunderstanding simple english? I am not english and can understand what is the meaning of "I am too busy to deal with you personally" I have not said I would 'deal with' you as you saying : "how precisely do you mean to 'deal with' me?" I will not explain further if you still want to think I am wikiharassing you. You were the one came to me to tell me what I did was a bad idea. So you think I am acting in bad faith? And now straightup throwing it in my face? You are wikiharassing me. --UNK 07:57, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you studying my edit history? Tenebrous 08:14, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am studying your edit history to understand what you have been doing here. Why are you concerned about me studying your edit history which are publicly accessibly anywhere in the world? --UNK 08:33, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe most people scrutinize the edit histories of everyone that they come into contact with; I find it slightly strange, and wonder what your motivations are. I (clearly) have nothing to hide, and nothing, in fact, that I would want to. Why are you so reluctant to state your motivation? Tenebrous 08:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Im about half through looking at you history and you are most civil and from a scientific point of view. You make some personal attacks[1][2] and at a couple of time you said someone was "bad faith"[3] But mainly you are civil and try to be fair. --UNK 09:30, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by 'deal with'? The first thing I can think of is that you mean 'deal with' as in 'talk to'; however, you are clearly communicating with me so I have to assume that that is not what you mean---unless perhaps you mean some sort of in-depth conversation. The other alternative is that by 'deal with' you refer to some sort of action that you would otherwise take if you were not so busy. I'd like to know what that action might be, if that is in fact what you mean. Tenebrous 08:14, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You still are non-understanding of me. I said I am too busy to deals with you, and I mean like this questioning that you are bothering me with. --UNK 08:33, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I certainly don't mean to bother you; I'm just asking questions. You are under no obligation to answer them immediately. You could even just ignore me, though that might be somewhat rude. Tenebrous 08:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am happy you share my point of view on answering communication. --UNK 09:30, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am perfectly willing to accept any explanation you choose to give, and given that explanation, I will certainly apologize for implying that you might be harassing me. Tenebrous 08:14, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't need an apology. I havent joined Wikipedia for my own ego. --UNK 08:33, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, alright then. Tenebrous 08:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My "warning"

English not your first language by chance? Gimme a break, I said if he's going to be anal and if you had bothered to click on the link you'd see it means "anybody seen as overly worried about small details" - Not a "personal attack". I have looked at your edit history and I have a good mind to open a RfC regarding your behavior... _{ĢĿ€Ñ §τοĿĿ€Ŗγ}^Ť_č 11:40, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is a personal attack. --UNK 11:47, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And I take you comment on my language as a personal attack. --UNK 11:49, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My question re English being a second language to you was/is dead serious... care to answer me? As for it being a personal attack? I suggest you read WP:NPA I would normally delete your vandalism of my talk page but I am going to leave it there as evidence for the Arbitration Committee in the RfC/RfA regarding your behavior. Keep up the "good" work! _{ĢĿ€Ñ §τοĿĿ€Ŗγ}^Ť_č 11:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is my 2nd warning, no personal attacks and no uncivilness. --UNK 12:05, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me, do you think repeatedly calling someone dishonest is a personal attack? _{ĢĿ€Ñ §τοĿĿ€Ŗγ}^Ť_č 12:10, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That comment is on an official dispute page with evidence and important for the arbitrators to be aware of. --UNK 12:12, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, no, sorry, wrong ...again **sigh** Try here and here for a start. And you didn't answer my question... Since you have obviously performed a far more thorough study of WP:NPA than me, tell me: do you think repeatedly calling someone dishonest is a personal attack? _{ĢĿ€Ñ §τοĿĿ€Ŗγ}^Ť_č 12:25, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quit harassing me and begin the RfC if you have a problem. --UNK 12:26, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Terryeo

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Terryeo. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Terryeo/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Terryeo/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, --Tony Sidaway 19:48, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UNK, I would advise you to be careful here. In attempting to prove your point in the arbitration process, you come close to making personal attacks against Wikipediatrix.[4]] --Terrancommander 11:06, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Terryeo

This case is closed. Details of the final decision are published at the link above.

For the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 16:59, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Address Unknown Logo.jpg

Hello, UNK. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Address Unknown Logo.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:UNK. This image or media was removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 00:10, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]