User talk:UDCIDE

December 2024

Hello, I'm CipherRephic. An edit that you recently made to David H. Huntoon seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! CR (talk) 12:34, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi UDCIDE! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Schazjmd (talk) 21:54, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello UDCIDE! The thread you created at the Teahouse, SANDBOX. As a rookie, I started editing the suggested article and was blocked from publishing it. I have since been directed to create my sand box. Now I need instructions on getting this article into my sandbox. I have reread all the tutorials and have yet to find those instructions. How do I get the article I started editing into my sand box?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:UDCIDE/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 21:18, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, UDCIDE! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 21:18, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick response. As a new adventurer into this world of Wiki article editing, I used this opportunity on this article to learn. Again, thanks for the guidance. UDCIDE (talk) 21:26, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not encyclopedia-like

Your Tripartite Revisited is more of an essay than it is an encyclopedia article. If you submit if to AfC it will be Rejected, and likely Speedy Deleted. If you want to preserve it I recommend copying it to your own computer and then deleting the content from Wikipedia. David notMD (talk) 21:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the input. Will research what an 'encyclopedic article is, what Wiki says it is then decide to submit or forego Wiki. Thanks, again. 47.210.80.24 (talk) 22:02, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello UDCIDE! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Footnotes, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:42, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]