User talk:Tzusheng/sandbox/Wikipedia:Wikibench/Archive/Entity:Diff/1162855588/1162855651
Revdel'ed
[edit]@Tzusheng relevant revisions have been deleted. – robertsky (talk) 15:12, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
RevDel
[edit]Hi @Fehufanga, how did you evaluate this edit? It's revision-deleted, and only accessible to admins. Did you see it before it was RevDel'd? Also, @Tzusheng, this is something to be aware of. I've come across a handful of diffs where one or both revisions were revision-deleted, so they can't be accessed by non-admins. Actualcpscm (talk) 15:49, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, @Fehufanga, @Actualcpscm, and @robertsky. A potential short-term solution for this 1-week field study is that I can request a speedy deletion for this Wikibench's entity page, given that it is currently in my sandbox and should satisfy the requirement for speedy deletion. However, in the longer term, I may need to update Wikibench to catch these deleted revisions automatically and remove them from the table and dataset. Since it will likely take longer than our field study to fix it, please feel free to ping me whenever you stumble upon these entity pages, which I can request for speedy deletion after receiving a notification. What do you all think about this short-term solution? Tzusheng (talk) 16:27, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Tzusheng. I am ok. WP:U1 should cover the request. However, if you want an archive, I can assist in moving to say, "User:Tzusheng/sandbox/Wikipedia:Wikibench/Archive/Entity:Diff/*" while suppressing the redirects (page mover here. this is covered by WP:PMRC#2). This should prevent such entity pages coming up in the table? – robertsky (talk) 16:44, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Robertsky Thank you for your kind offer! Others also raise the same issue here. I think moving to archive may work, but I am also worried about introducing too many troubles and workloads on your end. How about let's continue the discussion on the talk page of the campaign page, given that it seems to be a broader issue than this specific edit? Tzusheng (talk) 16:56, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Let's do that. :) – robertsky (talk) 17:15, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Robertsky Thank you for your kind offer! Others also raise the same issue here. I think moving to archive may work, but I am also worried about introducing too many troubles and workloads on your end. How about let's continue the discussion on the talk page of the campaign page, given that it seems to be a broader issue than this specific edit? Tzusheng (talk) 16:56, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Tzusheng. I am ok. WP:U1 should cover the request. However, if you want an archive, I can assist in moving to say, "User:Tzusheng/sandbox/Wikipedia:Wikibench/Archive/Entity:Diff/*" while suppressing the redirects (page mover here. this is covered by WP:PMRC#2). This should prevent such entity pages coming up in the table? – robertsky (talk) 16:44, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Judging by the edit summaries, this was probably seen by Fehufanga pretty much immediately after it was made, and about 8 minutes before it was revdeled. Do these have to be removed from the dataset @Tzusheng? I'm fairly confident the rating is correct just based off the metadata, and diff could possibly be retrieved when collating the data by requesting temporary WP:RESEARCHER access to viewdeleted or something, assuming the foundation is willing to grant it. Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:17, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- I raised a concern about this here. Actualcpscm (talk) 14:54, 3 July 2023 (UTC)