User talk:TyroneBiggums23

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TyroneBiggums23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Would like to edit constructively and get second chance after a rough start where I was wrong and made mistakes, due to edit warring, but when I try to do so I am attacked by admin writ keeper. Why bother spending all the effort to prevent someone who wants to contribute? Why not go for the real bad guys that solely attempt to damage? I agreed to stop edit wars long ago. Tired of making new accounts and wasting everyone's time, would greatly appreciate another shot at this. Thank you. TyroneBiggums23 (talk) 06:50, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't unblock socks, ever. You should request an unblock from your original account. Max Semenik (talk) 09:20, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi, what other accounts do you have? Bjelleklang - talk 09:20, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

His main account is User:MikeFromCanmore, which has had talk page and email access removed due to abuse.

We've been over this, Mike. You're not allowed to create new accounts, use IP addresses, or do any other form of editing while you're blocked. Period. End of story. It doesn't matter what your intentions are; the block is on you, not just your multitude of accounts. If you keep making them, they will keep getting blocked, and their changes will keep getting reverted. You had the option of requesting an unblock from your main account instead of creating more sockpuppets, but you didn't take it until it was too late and you had displayed your intentions quite clearly. Go find somewhere else to spend your time; there are lots of other places on the Internet. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 14:26, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have the option to appeal at that page anymore, my editing rights there have been taken away because I was wrongfully accused of being a sock for another user. And my intentions have been displayed clearly all along. To make comparisons unbiased, which isn't disruptive in the least. So I'll ignore your last sentiment. TyroneBiggums23 (talk) 16:58, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TyroneBiggums23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no option to appeal at original account, it was taken away because it was wrongfully accused of being a sock for another user. Isn't there such a thing as a clean start?

Decline reason:

In that case, you'll need to appeal directly to ArbCom. -jpgordon^{::==( o )} 17:49, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]