User talk:Typeprint

Welcome!

Hello, Typeprint! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 14:13, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Notices

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

I want to emphasize the part about, you have done nothing wrong. As a new editor jumping into some political topics you should be aware of some of these special rules. Springee (talk) 15:49, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RFC on the Reagan page

You have added a RFC to the Reagan talk page.....but there is already a on-going RFC on this subject. I think you need to self-revert.Rja13ww33 (talk) 17:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If so, I was misled by "But this nebulous criteria on length may take something like a RFC to resolve.Rja13ww33 (talk) 19:48, 10 July 2020 (UTC)" Typeprint (talk) 17:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You need to revert. We will hash out the details when the RFC is settled.Rja13ww33 (talk) 17:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and did it.Rja13ww33 (talk) 17:33, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No consensus for your reversions

The discussion at ANI and talk does not support your reversions at Khive. I suggest you stop. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 17:23, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

None of what you did was a "compromise" and what you are adding back was not stable content. It was recently added and was a BLP vio from the start. Stop revert-warring. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 18:06, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]