User talk:TypeBoots

Hello, TypeBoots! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 05:26, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TypeBoots (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why was I blocked? I was asked to login by administrator MastCell and I did so, all of my edits have been constructive in discussion on a talk page. I don't know what Shell is talking about on the SCIMD talk page . I removed the mention of WP:OR from my own comments when I realized I was using the word incorrectly. Why would removing words from my own comments be grounds for a block? Please check my talk page for the diffs, I couldn't see to include them in this request.

Decline reason:

New accounts dedicated solely to editing highly contested articles may safely be presumed to be sockpuppets of others. — Sandstein 11:34, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Here are the diffs for above. I don't know why, but I couldn't include them in the unblock request. [1] & [2] TypeBoots (talk) 05:50, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, you came in right after the last sock was blocked, started advocating the same things, with the same wording and even repeating your habit of starting a new section for each comment you make. I have very little doubt that you have created multiple accounts for use on the article and keep starting a new one each time you are blocked. Please stop. Shell ^babelfish 06:55, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then I want a CheckUser run to prove that you are wrong. I didn't do anything wrong. The admin. MastCell asked me to log in and this is what happens, totally unfair. Obviously he admin just wanted me to log in so I could be banned. TypeBoots (talk) 07:02, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uhhuh - been here one day and know what a checkuser is. That's really not going to help your case. And no, I'm seriously considering having your IP range rooted out so it won't matter if you log in or not - again, please stop. Shell ^babelfish 07:14, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead. Last time I was aware knowing how Wikipedia worked wasn't a crime. TypeBoots (talk) 07:21, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: as Shell was the blocking admin, it would probably be helpful if neutral and uninvolved admins also review this situation. — Athaenara ✉ 07:40, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uhm, that's why I didn't remove the block note ;) - anyone is welcome to review it and contact me if they have any questions about the sock problem on the article or the Arb case surrounding it. Shell ^babelfish 08:24, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The fat lady sings

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Uponleft. MastCell ^Talk 19:57, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm down, but not out. See you guys soon. TypeBoots (talk) 04:50, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]