User talk:Tycoon24/Archive Christopher Cox

Article on Christopher Cox

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

No, what makes this editor's edits problematic is not "edit warring," as I understand the expression, but rather that this editor is rolling back several generations of edits repeatedly and without discussion on the talk page. That makes these edits vandalism. That is problematic no matter whether the editor is "warring" or inserting the edits at a more leisurely pace. JohnnyB256 (talk) 03:32, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You should go back and take another look, you're arguing a moot point. I could turn around and suggest the very same thing, that you are in fact editing out everything I edit in order to keep truth from being added to the SEC Chairman wikipage. If you go back to the very first few edits I created, I indeed did not erase generations of edits. I believe you are; in fact, editing history from the Christopher Cox wikipage will prove that you are erasing facts and vandalizing while intentionally lying on Wikipedia.

So how about this - You, JohnnyB256, take what I have edited using unbias facts, and without erasing what I have edited over generations and over several months now, add whatever it is you are attempting to write. But you cannot simply choose to erase facts from the wikipage in order to continue discussing McCain's 2008 elections strategy. You should try going to McCain's wikipage and doing so, or possibly go to the 2008 U.S. elections wikipage and add it there, but it does not belong in the section for how the SEC Chairman is reacting to the credit crisis. Tycoon24 04:03, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, user JohnnyB256 has decided to continue his "edit war" by erasing, rolling back, generations of edits in order to post his blog links, or whatever agenda he is attempting to exploit using wikipedia. He is violating the rules, again. Tycoon24 2:52PM, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Jim Cramer discusses his reasoning, after careful research, why he's holding the SEC accountable for Madoff. Tycoon24 11:21PM, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

The wikipage for Jim Cramer appears to have been vandalized by bloggers who are spreading false lies about Jim Cramer. I am fixing this page to make it accurate.

Moved to Archive. Tycoon24 (talk) 22:21, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]