User talk:Txtcircus

Christina Aguilera

I have reverted your edit to this article as, among other things, you sought to fix some of the image sizes. This is not suggested; per MOS:IMAGES:

"As a rule, images should not be forced to a fixed size (that is, one that overrides the default)."

If you wish to limit their sizes, you can set your own user preference to reflect. Tabercil (talk) 05:32, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

I dont have to guess that you do not like britney spears after you lowered her album sales. Well dont because even if you have cites to back it up, some are outdated and some only focuse on the millionth point ala britney.com . If you choose to lower her album sales once more then it makes no difference since your edits will be changed back by me and the many brit fans that guard the page sincerly--BlackoutBritney (talk) 23:00, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Christina Aguilera, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tabercil (talk) 01:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Christina Aguilera. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Ward3001 (talk) 20:53, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Many of your sources are blogs or non official sites that have no expertise it certification awards. — R ² 21:34, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — R ² 23:12, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Circus (Britney Spears album), you will be blocked from editing. Please study WP:RS more carefully. — R ² 12:32, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page In the Zone has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — Super-Magician ^{(talk • contribs • count)} 00:49, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Britney Sales

why do you put that Blackout sold 2.3 million copies with fake sources? i put TWO SOURCES that say Blackout sold over 3.1 million copies and heybritney.com also confirms it so stop editing that. Also B in the mix sold over a million copies but you deleted the source and put 200,000 copies, don't do that again! Thanks. --BritneyFeli (talk) 17:56, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, There are two sources that says that Blackout has sold 3.1 million WW. I don´t understand why you keep saying that it is 2.5 million? Thanks--Albes29 (talk) 17:26, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Somebodytl.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Somebodytl.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:41, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Thalia discography, you will be blocked from editing. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 05:32, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This apply due the fact that you has been adding unsourced, or inproper sourced content, after several warning that other user left you before. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 05:32, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nirvana

Hi, thanks for adding the Sales and Certifications to Nevermind, In Utero (album) and MTV Unplugged In New York. It would be great if you could do the same for the Nirvana (album) of 2002 aswell. Thanks. mjgm84 (talk) 07:38, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Most of it has been reverted, actually. Chart info is fine but I really don't think we need sales data for a dozen+ countries, that is getting a bit too into statistical minutiae for an encyclopedia entry. Tarc (talk) 13:06, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, all that information is too WP:INDISCRIMINATE. --JD554 (talk) 17:24, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Nevermind. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JD554 (talk) 17:10, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]