User talk:Twolniewicz

I don't believe the "Footed Pajamas" website is sufficiently notable (WP:CORP) to warrant a Wikipedia article. The only alternative to redirecting I considered was recommending deletion, via a {{prod}} tag, or Wikipedia:Articles for deletion if necessary. Ravenna1961 (talk) 02:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Both Dr. Denton and Carter's, Inc. are over 100 years old; the former has a 100 year old patent on the basic design and the latter is a publicly traded company, meaning both easily meet the guidelines at WP:CORP. The less-than-two-years-old company "Footed Pajamas" clearly doesn't, and your complaint about redirecting "footed pajamas" doesn't hold any water, as that is clearly one of the many terms commonly used to describe the garment described in the blanket sleeper article. Ravenna1961 (talk) 04:25, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Footed pajamas.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Footed pajamas.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:03, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]