User talk:Twodayslate 66

July 2017

Greetings. Please do not edit war to repeatedly insert material that other editors have objected to. The burden to achieve consensus is on those who seek to include disputed material, not those seeking to remove it. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 05:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You made those modifications to include letter, therefore consensus was reached.--Twodayslate 66 (talk) 05:17, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And that consensus has now changed. Please provide reasons that this material, in your opinion, meets the requirements of due weight and sensitivity to living persons at the appropriate discussion page. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 05:26, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 05:43, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]