User talk:Twerbrou
Terminator 3
[edit]You say it's not my decision whether content is important or not, but that is the entire point of an editor. If no one removes unimportant content, it becomes full of useless information. That's the equivalent of the "it's not your job" defense, but since Wikipedia is almost 100% user run, it is everyone's job. The person who added it wanted it to be in there. Since they are an anonymous user, it is possible that they are unaware that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. So, saying that they thought it was important, is speculative. ColdFusion650 (talk) 16:18, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
- I assume you mean by "well tried with the link" that the link I posted went to something completely unrelated. Unfortunately, I was one letter off on mistyping the link. I fixed it now. ColdFusion650 (talk) 20:27, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)