User talk:Tweetybird8621

tweety bird

August 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ricky Rudd has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ricky Rudd was changed by Tweetybird8621 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.914101 on 2015-08-23T20:37:55+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:37, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ricky Rudd. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 20:43, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nthep was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Tweetybird8621/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nthep (talk) 20:44, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ricky Craven, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Ricky Craven was changed by Tweetybird8621 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956226 on 2015-08-24T16:04:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:04, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:45, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:04, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note your disruptive editing on Alert Ready has been reverted. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tweetybird8621, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Tweetybird8621! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Samwalton9 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

lgname=Vandabot

August 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:52, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Tweetybird8621 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Highfangs9197 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

thats not vandalism or edit warring because you didnt include the activations dont decline this

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 19:27, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tweetybird8621 (talk) 15:00, 27 August 2015 (UTC) on your user talk page.[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tweetybird8621 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

adding activations to an Eas or Alert ready article is not vandalim please unban me with the username Highfangs9197 Tweetybird8621 (talk) 15:03, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Does not address reason for block. If you make another garbled unblock request, your talk page access will be revoked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:52, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, User:Tweetybird8621/sandbox

Hello, Tweetybird8621. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]