User talk:Tuwein

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tuwein (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not vandalized a single page, I also added many images(about 250, most of them were DMRC metro station images) to many articles. Nor did I disturbed any one. I am changed, you can check my edit history not a single bullshit. I will not edit anything other than adding images to articles which do not have a single image. And please note that skydutta is not one of my sock so do not punish an innocent for my deeds. And I know I'm not worthy to be spared from this block. I can continue to add images even without you lifting the ban by changing my ISP but I don't really want to keep hiding from your eyes to evade the block and the block has forced me to create more accounts(I created my second account only because I forgot the pass of the earlier, and at that time i was unaware of sock policy) and I know that I have to change my ISP to get past the ISP range scanner and spoof my user-agent, But I will not do that If I get unblocked. I will never participate in voting as long as you want, nor will I disrupt the IRC(I did it earlier because I was frustrated by these blocks). The choice Is Yours as I am now addicted I can not stop.Tuwein (talk) 19:20, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are not changed. You set up this account to violate WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. Until your original account is unblocked, you are not welcome here. Yamla (talk) 19:25, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The problem is that I do not know it's password. So probably I Will never be allowed to edit without creating another sock which I do not want but the block Is forcing me to do.Tuwein (talk) 19:30, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That account is globally locked, which means you have been causing cross-wiki disruption so you are not allowed to login to WMF wikis using it. On en.wiki, we generally do not accept appeals from globally locked socks. I didn’t bother requesting a lock of this account yesterday since I thought someone else was going to, but I’ll go ahead and request a steward to lock now. Your avenue of appeal for your main account is via stewards. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:38, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TonyBallioni, they've uploaded a lot of images to Commons which were then inserted in articles here. I raised concerns about their uploads here on Commons. I suspect the simplest way to clean up their contributions here might be to let the Commons bot do its job, but that assumes that Commons agree to mass delete. I remain pretty convinced that their image work is unlikely to be "own work" as not one of them seems to have any EXIF data even though they're all modern photos. - Sitush (talk) 14:47, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Sitush. I'm pinging Nick as my go to commons admin for xwiki socking there. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:16, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted the files. I'm happy that the copyright status for those files is unclear and to delete on that basis, in addition to the obvious problem on a globally locked user circumventing their lock to upload material to Commons. Nick (talk) 20:58, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]