User talk:Tutu1234

Welcome!

Hello, Tutu1234, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Shovon (talk) 08:14, 21 June 2008 (UTC) Shovon (talk) 08:13, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:27, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indo-Pakistani War of 1971

I have noticed you have been working on and devoting time on the article "Indo-Pakistani War of 1971" even presenting your views on old discussions on talk page. I would rather suggest and invite you to develop sub-articles of Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 or other Indo-Pakistani Wars. These article unlike Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 are yet to be properly worked on and discussed. --Your friend-UplinkAnsh (talk) 22:47, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You could search for reliable sources on the sub topics of Indo Pakistan War articles as many of these articles lack satisfactory amount of refrences and are biased. Reliable sources consists of news articles, books articles containing first hand account of incidents, etc. I am presently working on articles like PNS Ghazi, Sinking of PNS Ghazi and Battle of Chawinda, so I would suggest you, to start with, you could also help me to improve them and take part in discussions on talk page of these articles. Your friend---UplinkAnsh (talk) 15:30, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free images and rationales

Hello. When I made this edit I wasn't saying that the file should not be used in the article. I was saying that the image needs a rationale placed on the image's page for that article. Do you understand?--Rockfang (talk) 23:41, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of aircraft of the Indian Air Force

Hello, Tutu1234. Thank you for your contributions on the article List of aircraft of the Indian Air Force. However you recent edits have been identified as Vandalism and have been reverted. "I have given sources in the list below! I Will improve this article with latest figures within few days!" I have seen the sources you use, and they don't come in side the Wikipedia:reliable source. Various news articles result in pure inaccuracy. The List of aircraft of the Indian Air Force has already been done by me User:Recon.Army using a reliable single source. Any edits you make to aircraft numbers using you inaccurate sources will be treated as vandalism and removed as soon as possible. Recon.Army (talk) 09:33, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The current single source used is updated every year and is also used in the Air Force articles of (That I know) France, Spain, Greece, Italy, Turkey, Brazil, Germany and India. Using a singe source prevents inconsistent figures and a totally inaccurate article. The current source used was agreed upon by me an another editor.

Your threat to deliberately commit Vandalism is against the editor rules of Wikipedia. Recon.Army (talk) 18:25, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I warn you to stop you intentional vandalism. Recon.Army (talk) 18:25, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recon.Army I think you lack logic, and totally ignoring latest multiple sources provided for you old vintage source which has not been updated for a long time. Its simply useless to argue with aguys like you as people like you are hard headed and never listins. I think you deserve a Staunch warming for Vandalism. Truth Prevails 18:47, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Its Recon.Army who is hell bent on Vandalism. He is editing with a closed mind! Truth Prevails 18:50, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

I would appreciate it if you do not resort to personal attacks. Comments like "aguys like you" and "people like you are hard headed" are not tolerated. A Wikipedia administrator and I have agreed upon the current source used in the List of aircraft of the Indian Air Force article. The source is updated every year and is used on other various accurate wikipedia articles.Recon.Army (talk) 19:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would also appreciate that you stop following some delusion that what you say is correct, and multiple facts provided by others are False. I have not made a single personal comment but put forward the facts; you hv full right to call it whatever! No Doubt wikipedia is always about Stale Knowledge and not up-to-date information. Your source have not been updated from a long time and gives our False and Incorrect information, the links I had provided clearly suggests that 54 Mirage-2000 and 63 Mig-29 are going for upgrade, but you are hell bent on giving some incorrect source, denying the fleet strength even if Millions are paid for upgrade for this particular number of units! No doubt its Pure Vandalism and will cause further deterioration of wiki due to old and incorrect information. Tutu1234 (talk) 19:58, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to User talk:125.63.114.171, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. — Spike Toronto 19:50, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion is welcomed on deletion

I have marked Submarine operations, 1971 for deletion as this article constitute copy paste from other better written articles, original research and much content is 'cited' from forum PakDef.Info Kindly present your view here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Submarine operations, 1971. Swift&silent (talk) 07:24, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Kargil War

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Kargil War. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --lTopGunl (talk) 09:39, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]