User talk:Tuscanshrimp
August 2021
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:06, 22 August 2021 (UTC)Tuscanshrimp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Sockpuppet of who I am legitimately dumbfounded on what you mean. Is there some infamous vandal that only strikes Cuban political articles? Can I at least get a name for the person that you think I am. Also I was edit warring (like the other party involved) because the new revisions are not only clearly biased against Cuba but also its sources dont even work. If we want wikipedia to be truly unbiased we need to go back to the original revision or create a fusion of the two. Of course we should strive for an unbiased wikipedia but we cant ever truly be absolutely unbiased on every article. The old revison os clearly more pro cuba. The issue is we should pick the less biased one. By letting minor things like this slide you are paving the way for more and more biased articles with non-working and nonrelavent sources plaguing this wonderful house of learning.
Decline reason:
Confirmed sockpuppetry, which doesn't necessarily have to be another account. Yamla (talk) 11:13, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.