User talk:Turnbowie

This is Turnbowie's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Speedy deletion nomination of The Weeknd

Hello, Turnbowie,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Mydreamsparrow, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, The Weeknd, for deletion, because it is a very short article that doesn't provide readers with enough context to determine who or what the subject is.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Mydreamsparrow}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DreamSparrow ^Chat 19:21, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johann Biacsics. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:24, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Weekend (songwriter), you may be blocked from editing. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:26, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at The Weeknd, you may be blocked from editing. Zander251 (talk) 19:27, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. — MusikAnimal ^talk 19:39, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Turnbowie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block was clearly unwarranted. I was editing from a blocked IP so clearly MA used that as a excuse

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:41, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Turnbowie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As far as I know, I was blocked for moving a page [1]. Tried to explain it on the talkpage but wassuddenly blocked by someone else who suspected I had logged in under a different name. There is no connection to any previous accounts. Turnbowie (talk) 18:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Probable long term abuser. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also, if I deposit money in a bank, what do you care how many accounts I use to keep the money? Just because someone can download checkuser.exe and look up IP addresses doesn’t mean they’re right. Turnbowie 21:12, 23 December 2021 (UTC)