User talk:Turkishhistorian

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Turkishhistorian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Avi (talk) 00:58, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What wikipedia is not

Please take a look at WP:NOT, especially the sections on soapboxing, original research, and synthesis. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 00:58, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 06:38, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:SeljuqFlag.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:SeljuqFlag.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 17:47, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 05:17, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:25, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DenizTBG for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Buggie111 (talk) 04:18, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Genetic history of the Turkish people, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Blogs are not reliable sources. Cavann (talk) 02:54, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Genetic history of the Turkish people, you may be blocked from editing. For the last time, [1] is a blog and is not a reliable source. Cavann (talk) 22:00, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Genetic history of the Turkish people, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Blogs are not reliable sources. Jingiby (talk) 12:26, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Cavann (talk) 19:24, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013 Reply from Turkish Historian

I use open sources that use scientifically accepted methodologies.

Genetic history of the Turkish people and WP:ANEW

I have reviewed the report filed against you at ANEW. It appears that you sporadically edit Wikipedia and attempt to add unreliably sourced material to this article. Consider this a warning that if you do so again, even if it's in the distant future, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:32, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Genetics of Turkish People

[2] is a blog. [3] also comes from the blog [4]. You cannot add blog-sourced material to Wikipedia. Review Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Reliable Sources. Cavann (talk) 22:38, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of six months for repeated additions of unreliably sourced material after warnings, most recently to Genetic history of the Turkish people. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 22:50, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]