User talk:Turbospeedman

Turbospeedman, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Turbospeedman! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: ScreenRec (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ScreenRec and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ScreenRec, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @AngusWOOF, I have added some more references. ScreenRec has been covered on reputable sites like Ghacks [1], Digital Trends [2] Yahoo! and Ionos [3]. It is often named as one of the top and widely used screencasting software alongside OBS Studio, Bandicam,[4] ScreenFlow, Camtasia [5] ShareX, Debut Video Capture and CamStudio. [6] Therefore it is as notable as these software which have similar references and have their own Wikipedia articles already. Regards, Turbospeedman 22 January 2021

January 2021

Hello Turbospeedman. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Turbospeedman. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Turbospeedman|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 07:52, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS Hello GSS, I am not getting paid for writing this article, however I do work for the company that developed the software i.e., TeddySoft Ltd. I have made the 'conflict of interest' declaration on my user page article as per your advice. TeddySoft had hired a freelancer to publish an article for the software in Feb, 2020, but it got deleted soon after. At that time, the person who hired the freelancer was unaware of the policy that says hiring someone else to publish your article is disallowed. I sincerely apologize for this on their behalf. Now that ScreenRec has more media coverage, I decided to give it another shot myself. I have read the relevant policies and used the 'article for creation' option to submit this article. As per my understanding of the said policies, a person having a 'conflict of interest' is allowed to use this option (Please correct me if I am wrong). I would like to work on this according to Wikipedia's rules. I truly believe that ScreenRec is more notable than most of the software listed on this article: Comparison of screencasting software. Let me know if you need any further information regarding this. Regards, Turbospeedman 14 January 2021

It doesn't matter if you were specifically instructed to write it by your superiors, or if you are writing it from your own initiative. You are writing an article about your employer and therefore representing their interests, whether intentionally or not. Therefore, a general conflict of interest declaration isn't enough; a mandatory paid editing declaration is required. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:36, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Drm310. I understand that and have made the paid editing declaration. Let me know if I have done it correctly. Regards, Turbospeedman 19 January 2021

Yes, you did that correctly. Thank you for making the declaration. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:41, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ScreenRec (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

No evidence of satisfying either WP:GNG or WP:NSOFT.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ScreenRec and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ScreenRec, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS ^💬 16:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]