User talk:TurboCop

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TurboCop (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sock of anyone. I registered on 2 May 2017. My first interest when I registered was in uploading images. And thats what I did on Commons. I also made logged out edits on Eng wiki from dynamic IPs. I only started making logged in edits to Eng wiki last year. I will address the main points made in the SPI. There are no more than 4 references to me in said SPI, all of them wrong. The first is a wrong presumption that I took over all of Town Hill's work on Bangladesh-related pages. Mostly (80%) I edited History of Bangladesh, which was never edited by Faizan. A lot of the articles I've worked on were never edited by Faizan. Actually I have a greater overlap with the filer of SPI than with Towns Hill or Faizan. There is almost no overlap with me and everybody else named on that SPI. So how can I be related to them? The second statement about me is that I used citation tool in the supposed first edit. The truth is I have edited before from dynamic IPs. There are no diffs given as evidence for me quibbling about who is a historian, branding scholars as pro-India, using Perry Anderson or working on scholars biography pages. I do none of those things. The third so-called evidence against me in the SPI is that I name scholars in edit summaries. But a lot of people do that, even filer does that. I picked up the habit from others I have seen. I have learnt a lot from other editors. Case in point is that my last edit summary on 07:40, 11 February 2019 was influenced by Worldbruce's edit summary on 15:28, 4 December 2018‎. The fourth and final piece of evidence against me is that the filer thinks I seem to know what Fowler&fowler said. But in truth nothing I said in the diff shown even mentions Fowler&fowler or any discussion anyone had with him. The talk about general history is guidance I have taken from Worldbruce's comment in Talk:Indo-Pakistani war of 1971 on 16:11, 23 April 2018. MekoScopiBangle is not me either, why would I create another account while there was a SPI? That account edited Indo-Bangladeshi enclaves which I have never edited. TurboCop (talk) 09:23, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As the conclusion of the SPI said: "With meatpuppetry, it may be hard to tell who they belong to but they are of the same POV sock cloth." I also don't think you seriously expect us to believe this. Huon (talk) 18:29, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There was a discussion on this talk page about your account during July 2018 which remains unresolved. Orientls (talk) 15:50, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]