User talk:Tupacmakaveli

Welcome!

Hello, Tupacmakaveli, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! WadeSimMiser (talk) 01:16, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Thugz.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Thugz.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 06:26, 18 January 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 06:26, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bone Thugs-n-Harmony, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 23:26, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Bone Thugs-n-Harmony. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 02:33, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Bone Thugs-n-Harmony, you will be blocked from editing. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 02:43, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tupacmakaveli for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 04:07, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tupacmakaveli. After reviewing the case above, it appears that you edited the page in question using an IP address. Often times people do this in an attempt to avoid scrutiny, and it is commonly referred to as socking, or using more than one account/IP in an abusive manner. While the IP edit outlined in the case may have been made in error (not knowing you were logged out) it is still inappropriate and I ask that you do not do so again. Also, because you are currently involved in a small edit war with Andrewlp1991, it is recommend that instead of simply reverting to your preferred preference you discuss it with the user or on the articles talk page. Tiptoety ^talk 08:12, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Bone Thugs-n-Harmony. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 21:51, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Repeated Vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:31, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tupacmakaveli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because I alwayz put Trust Info ..give me 1 more chance

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Sandstein 12:53, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tupacmakaveli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i only edited right info.. n plus i didn't knew much about wekipedia... but now i fully understand .. soo please unblock me now.. i promise i won't let u down

Decline reason:

Your next unblock request better make some sense, address the reasons for your block, and demonstrate clearly that you understand the problem or you will likely find your ability to appeal the block in this manner will be revoked. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:41, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tupacmakaveli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Don't know what i did wrong please tell him.. because i dont what i did,

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tupacmakaveli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

ok maybe i kept on putin wrong infomation .. n uploading image .. that won't happen again

Decline reason:

Maybe? No. You DID. There's no "maybe" to it. Smashville^talk 14:14, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tupacmakaveli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok .. What can do to unblock myself ..

Decline reason:

At this point not much. You have been warned repeatedly in the past to improve your behavior, and those warnings had little to no effect on changing your behavior. You have also been unconvincing in your numerous unblock requests above, which show little understanding of what is expected of Wikipedia editors with regards to proper behavior. At this point, you need to contact the Ban Appeals Subcommittee in order to be reinstated, since it is clear that no regular administrator will be doing that. You can contact them by the email address found at WP:BASC. Jayron32 06:12, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.