User talk:Tucsontammy

Welcome!

Hello, Tucsontammy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Tucson, Arizona. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Go Phightins! (talk) 03:42, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Tucsontammy. You have new messages at Go Phightins!'s talk page.
Message added 18:15, 30 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Go Phightins! (talk) 18:15, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tucsontammy, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Tucsontammy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there!

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 00:53, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Aaron Schock does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! (Sometimes this makes the edit a little more difficult than simply hitting "undo"; but giving the reasons for the undo/revert will help other editors understand why the reversion was done, rather than fixing simple vandalism.) Closeapple (talk) 23:05, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that you actually have usually added edit summaries in the past when making edits to the Aaron Schock article. Thanks! --Closeapple (talk) 23:08, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Styrk.com for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Styrk.com is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Styrk.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 05:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Styrk Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Styrk Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:26, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rebel Pundit for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rebel Pundit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebel Pundit until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sammy1339 (talk) 05:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rebel Pundit for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rebel Pundit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebel Pundit (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 14:42, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]