User talk:Tubenn

References

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:12, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Citrullination, you may be blocked from editing. It is now the third time you try to add a reference to an OMICS journal in Citrullination, which from your username, also indicates you are trying to promote your own work. This is not allowed in Wikipedia. See WP:COI and WP:NOTPROMO. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 09:53, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In fact it seems all your editing on Wikipedia has been the insertion of your own research into article. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 09:58, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Headbomb,

First of all, thank you for your work for the Wiki community. Regarding the reference to the citrullination, the mentioned article has been through thorough peer-review and while the journal is now blacklisted, it was not at the time of publication and the paper is indexed by, among others, Scopus.com. There are no other current publications investigating the aspect of tryptic cleavage of citrullinated peptides, hence I figured that this reference would be better than none. However, as you disagree, I will not make further edits.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tubenn (talk • contribs) 10:03, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OMICS has never been considered acceptable on Wikipedia, regardless of whether or not it was blacklisted at the time of publication. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 10:06, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adding references

Hello. If you want to add references to articles, it can be useful to try the very easy toollabs:citationhunt/en which will direct you to paragraphs most in need of such help. Once you've gained confidence with the process, it gets easier to make bigger contributions, such as adding new theories and stuff. Nemo 18:03, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nemo. Thank you very much. I will checkout the tool for any future written contributions.