User talk:Tt 225

Bravenet

Thanks for the quick reversion of the vandalism on Bravenet ;-) Snowolf^(talk)_CON^COI - 14:08, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Incidentally your warning was blanked within minutes, but reverted. Tt 225 14:21, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I see you marked my recently created The Pax Cecilia page as a potential "speedy deletion", citing that it "does not assert the importance or significance of its subject". I'm not sure how I should explicitly do that, but the band has done multiple nationwide tours, and sent out over 5000 copies of it's last records. I believe there are bands with wikipedia pages that we are larger and more well known than. Thus I think a wikipedia page for the band is valid. Thanks, John Feustel —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tsoka (talk • contribs) 01:20, 9 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Apologies if it was misplaced, but I couldn't see anything matching the criteria given by Wikipedia:Notability (music) for a band. Tt 225 01:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted vandalism

I noticed... but thanks for quickly spotting the mistake and for your message. Happy hunting! -- MightyWarrior 23:15, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BDSM/translation

You're welcome! I often do the same thing, and wait for another editor to agree with me. Feels better when someone backs you up, ya know? Magichands 19:26, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake?

I don't remember contributing anything to Castlepollard, positive or negative. I've asked everyone here and they all claim that they didn't do anything. Is it possible some sort of mistake has been made? Thank you. --213.202.190.162 14:54, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for changing the name of my article 'Jeffrey Archer short story' and putting it on the disambiguation page. I was trying to do it myself but didn't know how. User:6afraidof7

Glad to see that you agree with my suggestion, and obviously this change was not a criticusm of how you did it in the first place. The hard work was in writing the article.Tt 225 (talk) 22:59, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Tt 225! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Sandbox

Why did you put up the Sandbox for deletion and then instantly take it back down?

Multi Trixes! (Talk - Me on Wikia) 23:05, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. It just seems that you wanted it deleted, like I understand was stupidly done before.

Multi Trixes! (Talk - Me on Wikia) 23:37, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine. Oh, by the way, did you click "new section" above my talk page? Messages go below the table of contents. But nothing I can't fix.

Multi Trixes! (Talk - Me on Wikia) 23:48, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You shouldn't have done that in the first place, since it is violation per WP:DP. Ian Streeter (talk) 18:14, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Tt 225,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tt 225. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tt 225. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tt 225. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]