User talk:Tsukuyo-yomi

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tsukuyo-yomi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Respected AntanO, I am sorry for my act in abusing multiple accounts. I forget my password many times. So I create a new account many times. But I realize my mistake. Please give me a chance. You banned my account indefinitely. If it continues, then how will I gave my contribution to wikipedia? So please forgive me and unblock me. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. You are not blocked directly. Which is the 'master' account? That is, what is your original account, the one marked as a sockpuppeteer account? Why aren't you using the password recovery process rather than setting up additional accounts, which you know is not permitted? Yamla (talk) 14:47, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tsukuyo-yomi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

When did my block gets expired? I had wait for 13 days. I am a new user to Wikipedia. I don't know about abusing multiple accounts. Please forgive me. Your block my hands for my contribution to wikipedia. I request you with tear filled eyes. Please give me a chance.

Decline reason:

This account is not blocked. If you are being prevented from editing by an IP block, then you need to follow the instructions given and tell us the full message you see when you try to edit. (If you do not wish to reveal your IP address, you can make your request via WP:UTRS.) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:01, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tsukuyo-yomi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am sorry sir. My master account is tsukuyo-yomi. I forget about password recovery on that time. Please give me a chance. I ask unblock request to you for 3 weeks continuously. Before my unblock, I gave my lot of contributions to wikipedia. Still I gave my contributions to English wikipedia. So please unblock me.

Decline reason:

Please explain the entry in your user creation log that says, "I create a new account because my old account was banned". --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 03:01, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tsukuyo-yomi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please unblock me. I request you with tear filled eyes. Why you don't uderstand me? I only want a chance. I accept frankly my mistake. But you don't unblock me. Why?

Decline reason:

This account is not blocked. If you are being prevented from editing by an IP block, then you need to follow the instructions given and tell us the full message you see when you try to edit. (If you do not wish to reveal your IP address, you can make your request via WP:UTRS.) If you continue to ignore these directions - you may find your access to this talkpage revoked. SQL^{Query me!} 03:52, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Naagini (Tamil TV series)

The article Naagini (Tamil TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article that fails to credibly assert notability of the subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AussieLegend (✉) 10:56, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Problematic edits

Re: this edit, where you restored the Naagini (TV series) article, you have restored an article on a dub of a television series, Naagin. That makes very little sense. In order for an article to exist at Wikipedia, it has to have independent notability, meaning that in this case, a language dub of an existing television series must draw unique attention from newspapers, magazines, books, etc., and that the unique attention details what is unique about the dub. What was the cultural impact of the dub? What thought went into producing the dub? What obstacles did producers have to overcome? Please familiarize yourself with our General Notability Guideline. To put it in perspective, SpongeBob SquarePants is shown all over the world in dozens of languages. We do not have dozens of articles on dubs of SpongeBob Squarepants.

Additionally, in this edit you blanked a significant portion of Naagin (TV series). While this may have been a mistake, it is indistinguishable from vandalism. Please double-check your edits by clicking "Show preview" and "Show changes" before saving your changes. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:03, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Naagin (TV series), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 07:44, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Naagin (TV series), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:51, 30 October 2016 (UTC)